EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF CLOSED HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES USING LOCKED PLATE FIXATION

Giàu Nguyễn Hữu, Chơn Nguyễn Thanh, Lâm Nguyễn Văn, Phương Ngô Trí Minh, Hậu Võ Thị, Tú Hoàng Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Various surgical methods exist to treat closed humeral shaft fractures. Locked plating, which allows the use of both conventional and locking screws, provides enhanced stability, reduces complications, and enables early mobilization. Objective: To describe the general characteristics and evaluate the treatment outcomes of closed humeral shaft fractures using locked plates at Can Tho Central General Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A prospective interventional study without a control group was conducted on 31 patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral closed humeral shaft fractures who underwent locked plate fixation surgery. Results: The most common age group was 16–40 years, with farmers accounting for the highest proportion (29%). Type A fractures in the middle third of the humerus, classified by the AO system, were the most frequent (48.4%). The highest rate of bone union was observed in 96.8% of cases, with no patients experiencing poor or moderate bone healing outcomes. Regarding functional recovery of the shoulder and elbow joints, 96.8% of patients achieved excellent recovery, with no cases of mild or poor outcomes. Conclusion: Locked plate fixation is a safe and effective surgical method for treating closed humeral shaft fractures.

Article Details

References

1. Maximilian Leiblein, et aj (2019), “Nonunions of the humerus – Treatment concepts and results of the last five years”, Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 22, 187-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.04.002.
2. Phan Quang Trí (2018), “Phác đồ điều trị gãy thân xương cánh tay”, Phác đồ điều trị của Bệnh viện Chấn Thương Chỉnh Hình Phần Một, Giáo Dục Việt Nam, Hồ Chí Minh, tr. 207-210.
3. Nguyễn Anh Tuấn, Nguyễn Quang Long (2003), “Sử dụng nẹp tổ hợp các-bon (C3) điều trị gãy thân xương cánh tay”, Y Học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 7 (1), tr. 6-9.
4. Angela Christine Chang, et al. (2019), “The modified anterolateral approach”, Journal of Orthopeadic Surgery, 27 (3), pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1177/2309499019865954.
5. Sebastian Lotzien, et al. (2019), “ Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral midshaft fracture: anterior versus posterior plate fixation”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20 (1). DOI 10.1186/s12891-019-2807-3.
6. Rebekah Belayneh, et al (2019), “Final outcomes of radial nerve palsy assiociated wit humeral shaft fracture and nonunion”, J Orthop Traumatol, 20 (1), 18. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-019-0526-2.
7. Seyed Mahdi, et al (2019), “Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)”, Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 11, pp. 141-147. DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S212998.
8. Đỗ Đức Bình (2018), “Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị gãy kín đầu trên xương cánh tay bằng nẹp khóa tại Bệnh viện Quân Y 103”, Kỷ yếu Hội Nghị Khoa Học Thường Niên Hội Chấn Thương Chỉnh Hình Việt Nam lần thứ XVII, tr. 90.
9. Jae-Jung Jeong, et al (2019), “Narrow locking compression plate vs long philos plate for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of spiral humerus shaft fracture”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2697-8.