COMPARISON OF TIME TO STAND UP FROM A CHAIR IN PEOPLE WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS AND HEALTHY PEOPLE

Nhi Huỳnh Thị, Đạt Ngô Quốc

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Compare the time difference between sitting to standing movements with knee flexion angle 900 and knee flexion angle 1200  between patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy people. Subjects and methods: Patients with KOA and healthy people in the Ho Chi Minh city community, Department of Physical Therapy, An Binh hospital. Results: A total 20 subject, 2 men and 18 women, participated in the study. Average age 62,85 ± 6,37. The time in the preparation phase (CB) when moving sitting to standing at a knee flexion angle of 900 in the KOA group is (0,94 ± 0,34 seconds) longer than the healthy group is (0,61 ± 0,06 seconds) (t= 3,03, p = 0,013). When performing  sit-to-stand with a 1200 knee flexion, the time in the CB phase of the KOA group is (0,95 ± 0,21 seconds) longer than the healthy group 0,60 ± 0,09 seconds) (t = 4,86, p<0,001). In the rising phase (NL), when moving from sitting to standing with a knee flexion angle of 900, the KOA group was (1,12 [0,67; 1,66] seconds) longer than the healthy group (0,74 [0,71; 0,96] seconds) (Z = -2,80, p= 0,005). Moving from sitting to standing with a knee flexion angle of 1200, the time spent in the NL phase in the KOA group is (0,85 ± 0,24 seconds) longer than the healthy group (0,61 ± 0,12 seconds) (t= 2,81, p=0,012). Conclusion: Patients with KOA need more time to sit to stand than healthy people in both the CB and NL phase at two knee flexion angles of 900 and 1200.

Article Details

References

1. Ho-Pham LT, Lai TQ, Mai LD, Doan MC, Pham HN, Nguyen TV. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee and its relationship to self-reported pain. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4): e94563. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0094563
2. Anan M, Shinkoda K, Suzuki K, Yagi M, Ibara T, Kito N. Do patients with knee osteoarthritis perform sit-to-stand motion efficiently? Gait Posture. Feb 2015;41(2):488-92. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.015
3. Turcot K, Armand S, Fritschy D, Hoffmeyer P, Suvà D. Sit-to-stand alterations in advanced knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. May 2012;36(1): 68-72. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012. 01.005
4. Dall PM, Kerr A. Frequency of the sit to stand task: An observational study of free-living adults. Applied Ergonomics. 2010/01/01/ 2010;41(1):58-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009. 04.005
5. Sonoo M, Iijima H, Kanemura N. Altered sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics during sit-to-stand in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2019/11/11/ 2019;96:109331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109331
6. Duffell LD, Gulati V, Southgate DFL, McGregor AH. Measuring body weight distribution during sit-to-stand in patients with early knee osteoarthritis. Gait & Posture. 2013/09/01/ 2013;38(4):745-750. doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.015
7. Bouchouras G, Patsika G, Hatzitaki V, Kellis E. Kinematics and knee muscle activation during sit-to-stand movement in women with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Jul 2015;30(6): 599-607. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2 015.03.025
8. Schenkman M, Riley PO, Pieper C. Sit to stand from progressively lower seat heights -- alterations in angular velocity. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Apr 1996;11(3):153-158. doi:10.1016/0268-0033(95)00060-7
9. Hennington G, Johnson J, Penrose J, Barr K, McMulkin ML, Vander Linden DW. Effect of bench height on sit-to-stand in children without disabilities and children with cerebral palsy11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has/will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004/01/01/ 2004;85(1):70-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03) 00407-6