MODIFIED TLICS SCORE (MTLICS) FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT GUIDANCE IN THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES: A STUDY FROM PHU THO PROVINCIAL GENERAL HOSPITAL

Dao Quang Anh1,, Tran Quang Luc1, Vi Truong Son1, Nguyen Van Son1, Pham The Trang2, Duong Xuan Phuong1, Le Quyet Thang1, Hoang Van Duc1, Dang Van Quang1, Le Dinh Thanh Son1
1 Phu Tho Provincial General Hospital
2 Ninh Binh Provincial General Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the value of the modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (mTLICS) in diagnosing and guiding the treatment of thoracolumbar spine injuries at Phu Tho Provincial General Hospital. It also compared mTLICS with TLICS and TL AOSIS systems in predicting surgical and conservative treatment decisions. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 41 patients with thoracolumbar spine injuries from January to April 2025. All patients underwent a 3.0 Tesla MRI. Their injuries were classified using TLICS, TL AOSIS and mTLICS. The classification results were compared with treatment decisions to assess sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: mTLICS showed superior diagnostic performance with 89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 93% accuracy (based on the second reader). Inter-rater agreement was moderate to substantial (Kappa = 0.708 for fracture morphology and 0.8 for posterior ligamentous injury). The mTLICS also highly correlated with surgical decision-making (r = 0.779 and 0.755). Notably, it achieved the highest area under the ROC curve (AUROC: 0.939–0.95), compared to TLICS (0.855–0.874) and TL AOSIS (0.802–0.843). At a cutoff score >3, mTLICS reached 92–100% sensitivity and 81.25% specificity. Conclusion: mTLICS is a reliable and accurate classification system for thoracolumbar injuries, offering better predictive value than TLICS and TL AOSIS. Its implementation may enhance decision-making and treatment outcomes, especially in provincial hospitals.

Article Details

References

1. Almigdad A, Alazaydeh S, Mustafa MB, et al. Thoracolumbar spine fracture patterns, etiologies, and treatment modalities in Jordan. J Trauma Inj. 2023;36(2):98-104. doi:10.20408/jti.2022.0068
2. Nagi MAMA, Sakr MMS. Accuracy of MRI (TLICS vs AOSIS) in assessment of thoracolumbar spine injuries for guiding treatment. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2022;53(1):41. doi:10.1186/s43055-022-00715-1
3. Shu PC, Motah M, Massi DG, et al. Thoracolumbar spine injury in Cameroon: etiology, management, and outcome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):386. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06481-z
4. 4. Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024;50(4):1261-1275. doi:10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3
5. Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA, Hurlbert RJ, et al. A New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries: The Importance of Injury Morphology, the Integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex, and Neurologic Status. Spine. 2005;30(20):2325-2333. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000182986.43345.cb
6. Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, et al. The Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(4):329-334. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1563610
7. Park CJ, Kim SK, Lee TM, Park ET. Clinical relevance and validity of TLICS system for thoracolumbar spine injury. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19494. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76473-9
8. Park HJ, Lee SY, Park NH, et al. Modified thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) and its clinical usefulness. Acta Radiol. 2016;57(1):74-81. doi:10.1177/0284185115580487
9. Withrow J, Trimble D, Narro A, et al. Validation and Comparison of Common Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Treatment Algorithms and a Novel Modification. Neurosurgery. 2025;96(1):172-182. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003055
10. Bao LT, Thuan BN, Tien DD, et al. Imaging characteristics and reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of thoracolumbar spine injury. Cantho journal of medicine and pharmacy, 2024;(77):249-255. doi:10.58490/ctump.2024i77.2814