COMPARISON BEFORE AND AFTER ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT WITH NON EXTRACTION ON ADULT PATIENTS WITH ANLGE CLASS I MALOCCLUSION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Comparison before and after orthodontic treatment with non-extraction on adult patients with Angle class I malocclusion. Subjects and Methods: The sample included 30 pairs of pre and post-treatment cephalometric radiographies and 30 pairs of pre-treatment dental casts of patients treated orthodontic at the high-tech treatment area, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Ho Chi Minh City. Patients selected that had the following characteristics: class I skeletal correlation, class I malocclusion (Angle) and crowding of the mandibular teeth arch ≤ 9mm. AutoCAD 2018 software to measure the variables of teeth, bone and profile. Results: mandibular crowds: -1,08 ± 3,85mm, angle SNA at pre-treatment 81,60 ± 3,42°, increased in post-treatment 81,83 ± 3,68°. Occlusal plane at pre-treatment 7,57 ± 3,68°, increased in post-treatment 8,37 ± 3,31°. Projection distance of points A and B onto the occlusal plane pre-treatment -2,86 ± 2,38mm, increased in post-treatment -3,32 ± 2,02mm statistically significant p<0,05. The upper central incisor decreased inclined, the tooth axis rotates clockwise, angle U1/NA at pre-treatment 30,47 ± 7,69° decreased in post-treatment 26,80 ± 6,15° statistically significant p<0,05. The face convex angle, nasolabial angle, and lip-chin angle did not change significantly. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion with non-extraction in adults has changes in teeth, few in bone and soft tissue profile.
Article Details
Keywords
extraction, non-extraction, class I maloclusion
References
2. Hồ Thị Thùy Trang (1999), “Những đặc trưng của khuôn mặt hài hòa qua ảnh chụp và phim sọ nghiêng”, Luận văn thạc sĩ y học, TPHCM
3. Steiner C.C, "The use of cephalometric as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment", Am J Orthod, 1960, 46(10), pp.721-735
4. Konstantonis D, “The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes Class I”. Angle Orthodontist, 2012, 82 (2), pp.209-217.
5. Adeeba Khanum, Prashantha G.S: Extraction vs Non Extraction Controversy: A Review. JDOR. 2018; 14(1), pp.41-48
6. Drobocky O.B., Smith R.J. (1989), “Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 95(3), pp.220-230
7. Baccetti T, L Franchi (2005), “The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) Method for the Assessment of OptimalTreatment Timing in Dentofacial Orthopedics. Senimars in Orthodontics. 11(3), pp.119-129
8. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006