Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 24/07/2025
Abstract Views: 169
Views pdf: 63
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v552i2.15010
Issue
Vol. 552 No. 2 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Trịnh , H. A., Đinh, D. H., Lưu, M. Q., Trần, V. L., & Nguyễn, C. T. (2025). PERI-IMPLANT TISSUE STATUS DURING THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF FUNCTIONAL LOADING. Vietnam Medical Journal, 552(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v552i2.15010

PERI-IMPLANT TISSUE STATUS DURING THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF FUNCTIONAL LOADING

Hải Anh Trịnh , Diệu Hồng Đinh, Minh Quang Lưu, Văn Luân Trần, Cao Thắng Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 24 patients who received dental implants and met the criteria for prosthetic restoration at the Department of Odonto-Stomatology Clinic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, from September 2024 to October 2024. The participants underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans at 6 months after prosthetic restoration to assess peri-implant tissue status during the initial phase of functional loading. The study results showed that the majority of patients had a low Gingival Index (GI) (mean 0.63); the mean peri-implant pocket depth was 2.42 mm; the mean peri-implant bone loss was 0.97 mm over 6 months; and there were no statistically significant differences in peri-implant tissue parameters among different age groups, genders, or implant locations.

Article Details

Keywords

peri-implant tissue, first six months, functional loading

References

1. Reinhardt, B. and T. Beikler, Chapter 4 - Dental Implants, in Advanced Ceramics for Dentistry, J.Z. Shen and T. Kosmač, Editors. 2014, Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford. p. 51-75
2. Bra-nemark, P.-I., et al., Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1986. 77(3): p. 496-497
3. Niklaus P. Lang and Tord Berglundh, Peri-implant diseases: Where are we now? – Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011. 38: p. 178-181.
4. Sanz M and Chapple IL, Clinical Research on Peri-implant Diseases: Consensus Report of Working Group 4. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2012. 39: p. 202-206
5. Ravidà, A., et al., The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri-implant disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2022. 24(3): p. 287-300
6. Bawankar, P.V., A.P. Kolte, and R.A. Kolte, Assessment of peri-implant tissues in posterior implants placed using flapless approach: A clinicoradiographic study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 2024. 28(2): p. 197-203
7. Nidhi Mehrotra et al, Evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes around implant in partially edentulous patients: a clinico-radiographic study. Pan African Medical Journal, 2021. 38
8. Lê, N.L. and N.Đ.H. Nguyễn, Đánh giá kết quả mô mềm và phục hình sau điều trị implant tức thì phục hồi lại răng cối lớn thứ nhất hàm dưới tại bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2023
9. Nguyễn, P.T., et al., Thực trạng chăm sóc phục hình toàn hàm bắt vít trên bệnh nhân đã cấy ghép implant all on x tại Viện Đào tạo Răng - Hàm - Mặt năm 2018 - 2022. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2023
10. Kandasamy, B., et al., Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2018. 8(4): p. 361-364