THE MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF THE UNCINATE PROCESS ON PARANASAL SINUS CT SCANS

Đình Chương Nguyễn, Thị Kiều Thơ Nguyễn, Thanh Thúy Quỳnh Nguyễn, Minh Huấn Đoàn, Quang Huy Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The uncinate process is a key anatomical structure in the middle meatus, playing a critical role in frontal recess drainage and surgical orientation. Variability in its morphology and attachment sites may complicate surgical dissection and increase the risk of complications if not recognized preoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the morphological characteristics and anatomical variations of the uncinate process on paranasal sinus CT scans. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 152 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent paranasal sinus CT scans at Gia Dinh People’s Hospital from August 2024 to June 2025. The uncinate process was evaluated on thin-section CT scans (≤1 mm), classified according to the Landsberg and Frieman system, and assessed for pneumatization and other anatomical variations. Results: A total of 304 uncinate processes (both sides) were analyzed. Type 1 attachment (to the lamina papyracea) was the most common (53.3%), followed by type 2 (17.8%) and type 3 (11.2%). Pneumatized uncinate processes were observed in 20 cases (6.6%). Conclusion: Preoperative assessment of uncinate process morphology and variations on CT scans is essential for surgical planning and reducing complications in Endoscopic sinus surgery. Standardized CT evaluation protocols should be established to improve surgical safety and outcomes.

Article Details

References

Baldea V, Cobzeanu MD, Mihalcea F. Anatomical variants of the uncinate process–CT scan imaging study. Romanian Journal of Rhinology. 2012;2(7):139-48.
2. Güngör G, Okur N, Okur E. Uncinate process variations and their relationship with ostiomeatal complex: a pictorial essay of multidedector computed tomography (MDCT) findings. Polish journal of radiology. 2016;81:173.
3. Kim KS, Kim HU, Chung IH, Lee JG, Park IY, Yoon JH. Surgical anatomy of the nasofrontal duct: anatomical and computed tomographic analysis. The Laryngoscope. 2001;111(4):603-8.
4. Landsberg R, Friedman M. A computer‐assisted anatomical study of the nasofrontal region. The Laryngoscope. 2001; 111(12):2125-30.
5. Liu S-C, Wang C-H, Wang H-W. Prevalence of the uncinate process, agger nasi cell and their relationship in a Taiwanese population. Rhinology. 2010;48(2):239.
6. Luu K, Ospina J, Gurberg J, Janjua A. Assessing the Value of a Pre-operative CT Sinus Anatomy Review Tool. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2023;75(Suppl 1):860-6.
7. Netto B, Piltcher OB, Meotti CD, Lemieszek J, Isolan GR. Computed tomography imaging study of the superior attachment of the uncinate process. Rhinology. 2015;53(2):187-91.
8. Schreiber A, Ferrari M, Rodella LF, Nicolai P. Anatomy of the Frontal Sinus and Recess. In: Lal D, Hwang PH, editors. Frontal Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 11-25.