INVESTIGATING THE LINK BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS, INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE, AND CULPRIT CORONARY ARTERY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between psychological stress and anxiety with inflammatory response and culprit coronary artery in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 98 AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at Military Hospital 175 (June 2024–May 2025). Psychological stress and depression were assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Inflammatory markers included neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The culprit artery (LAD, RCA, LCx) was identified by coronary angiography. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman correlation, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: The mean age was 63,3 ± 10,3 years; 59,2% were male. Hypertension was present in 78,6%, diabetes in 44,9%, and dyslipidemia in 63,3%. The mean PSS-10 score was 18,1 ± 2,0 (moderate stress level); 14,3% had mild depression by PHQ-9. The mean NLR was 2,97 ± 2,20 and PLR was 134,5 ± 57,6. The culprit artery distribution was LAD 45,9%, RCA 35,7%, LCx 17,3%, and LM-LAD 1,0%. Spearman correlation showed no significant association between PSS-10/PHQ-9 scores and NLR or PLR (p > 0,05). No significant differences in PSS-10 and PHQ-9 scores were observed among LAD, RCA, and LCx groups (p > 0,05). Conclusions: Psychological stress and mild depressive symptoms are common in AMI patients. However, no significant association was found between stress/depression scores and inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR) or culprit artery location. Early psychological screening and intervention remain necessary to improve quality of life and treatment adherence.
Article Details
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction, stress, depression, NLR, PLR, culprit coronary artery.
References
2. Zhang L, Tong Z, Han R, et al. Global, Regional, and National Burdens of Ischemic Heart Disease Attributable to Smoking From 1990 to 2019. J Am Heart Assoc. Feb 7 2023;12(3): e028193. doi:10.1161/jaha.122.028193
3. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. Oct 12 2023;44(38): 3720–3826. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ ehad191
4. Kala P, Hudakova N, Jurajda M, et al. Depression and Anxiety after Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated
by Primary PCI. PLoS One. 2016;11(4): e0152367. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0152367
5. Thombs BD, Bass EB, Ford DE, et al. Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med. Jan 2006;21(1):30–8. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005. 00269.x
6. Chen Y, Chen S, Han Y, Xu Q, Zheng M, Zhao X. A combined index constructed based on NLR and PLR is associated with in-hospital mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15(6):4118–4128.
7. Trịnh Thị Thanh Tuyền, Nguyễn Thị Minh Lý, Bùi Văn Nhơn, Nguyễn Thị Đoài. Thực trạng lo âu ở người bệnh sau can thiệp động mạch vành 24 giờ tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng. 2023;6(05):97–103. doi:doi:10.54436/jns.2023.05.719
8. Liu J, Ao W, Zhou J, Luo P, Wang Q, Xiang D. The correlation between PLR-NLR and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(5):4892–4899.
9. Zhang WY, Nan N, Song XT, Tian JF, Yang XY. Impact of depression on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. Aug 20 2019;9(8): e026445. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2018-026445