DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS AFTER CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY AND RADIOFEQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION

Đình Phong Phan1,, Tuấn Việt Nguyễn2, Đình Hoàng Trịnh2
1 Bach Mai hospital
2 Thanh Hoa Provincial General Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac electrophysiological study and radiofequency catheter ablation are established methods for assessment and treatment for arrhythmia. Multiple intracardiac catheters are often necessary for electrophysiological study (EPS) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation therapy. Therefore, multiple venous sheath placement in one femoral vein is always required for multiple intracardiac catheter insertion.  Presence of the catheter in the vein increases the risk of blood clot formation, especially deep veinous thrombosis. The vascular complications incurred by placement of multiple sheaths have not been fully studied. We utilized duplex ultrasonography to assess the femoral veins before and after the procedure. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional, cluster-descriptive study on 144 patients with longitudinal follow-up after 01 month of the procedure at Thanh Hoa Provincial General Hospital from February 2022 to October 2022. All patients underwent routine Doppler ultrasound of lower extremity vessels before and immediately after procedures. In addition, at the follow-up visit after 1 month to assess and monitor venous thromboembolism events. Results: In 144 patients (mean age 54.7 ± 15.5 years with 87% being female) underwent procedures (mean time was 52.9 ± 9.8 minutes). Non-occlusive deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 10 patients (6.9%) on the day following the procedure. There were no significant differences in major complications when multiple sheath placement was compared with single sheath placement. Sex, height, BMI, venous diameter, multiple sheath placement, mean procedure time, average power as well as temperature during ablation all failed to have a significant influence on venous thrombosis.

Article Details

References

1. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, et al. Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia Due to Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Slow-Pathway Conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327(5): 313-318. doi:10.1056/NEJM199207303270504
2. Ouyang F, Cappato R, Ernst S, et al. Electroanatomic Substrate of Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia: Unidirectional Block and Macroreentry Within the Purkinje Network. Circulation. 2002;105(4):462-469. doi:10.1161/ hc0402.102663
3. Pandian NG, Kosowsky BD, Gurewich V. Transfemoral temporary pacing and deep vein thrombosis. Am Heart J. 1980;100(6):847-851. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(80)90065-4
4. Joynt GM, Kew J, Gomersall CD, Leung VYF, Liu EKH. Deep Venous Thrombosis Caused by Femoral Venous Catheters in Critically Ill Adult Patients. Chest. 2000;117(1):178-183. doi:10.1378/chest.117.1.178
5. Hughes P, Scott C, Bodenham A. Ultrasonography of the femoral vessels in the groin: implications for vascular access: Forum. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(12):1198-1202. doi:10.1046/ j.1365-2044.2000.01615-2.x
6. Moneta GL, Bedford G, Beach K, Strandness DE. Duplex ultrasound assessment of venous diameters, peak velocities, and flow patterns. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8(3):286-291. doi:10.1067/mva. 1988.avs0080286
7. Killewich LA, Macko RF, Cox K, et al. Regression of proximal deep venous thrombosis is associated with fibrinolytic enhancement. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(5):861-868. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70101-0
8. Meissner MH, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE. Venous diameter and compliance after deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1994;72(3):372-376.
9. Chen JY, Chang KC, Lin YC, Chou HT, Hung JS. Safety and Outcomes of Short-Term Multiple Femoral Venous Sheath Placement in Cardiac Electrophysiological Study and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation. Jpn Heart J. 2004;45(2):257-264. doi:10.1536/jhj.45.257
10. Bruce C, Saraf K, Rogers S, et al. Deep Vein Thrombosis is Common After Cardiac Ablation and Pre-Procedural D-Dimer Could Predict Risk. Heart Lung Circ. 2022;31(7):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/ j.hlc.2022.01.014