EVALUATION OF IMPLANT STABILITY AFTER IMPLANTATION BY FEEDBACK FORCE MEASUREMENT (IST) USING ANYCHECK DEVICE

Tuấn Anh Trần1,, Trương Như Ngọc Võ 2, Thu Trà My Nguyễn1, Thái Hậu Trần1
1 Becamex International Hospital
2 RHM Training Institute - Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate feedback force measurement to directly define stability on healing pillar after implantation through IST index on Anycheck device. Study subjects: Prospective descriptive study on 36 patients after mandibular dental implantation at location number 6, 7 with D3-bone at International Hospital Becamex from June 2022 to February 2023. Results: After Implantation, IST index was 77.3 ± 2.71; After 1 week, IST index was 74.5 ± 2.78; After 2 weeks, IST index was 75.8 ± 2.73; After 3 weeks, IST index was 76.2 ± 2.76; After 4 weeks, IST index was 76.8 ± 3.1; After 6 weeks, IST index was 77.8 ± 2.83. The ability to evaluate implant stability with feedback force measurement device Anycheck was initially considered to be safe and convenient, because this device can measure the force within 3 second for an implant without removing healing pillar, this can be beneficial to measure several implants for a single patient. The device is safely designed with force needed for each tap is only 1.0Ncm this can help to minimize surrounding structures of the implants. The device is only needed to tap with very small force 6 times for a test on well osseointegrated implant. However, only 2 times of tap needed for a test on badly osseointegrated implant.

Article Details

References

1. Atsumi M, Park S H, Wang H L, (2007), "Methods used to assess implant stability: current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22 (5), pp. 743-754.
2. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A, (2011), "One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22 (11), pp. 1303-1307.
3. H H, G W, E H, (2020), "The clinical significance of implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements: A literature review", J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 10 (4), pp. 629-638.
4. Lages F S, Douglas-de Oliveira D W, Costa F O, (2018), "Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: A systematic review", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20 (1), pp. 26-33.
5. Lee D H, Shin Y H, Park J H, Shim J S, et al, (2020), "The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter", J Adv Prosthodont, 12 (2), pp. 83-88.
6. Molina A, Sanz-Sánchez I, Martín C, Blanco J, et al, (2017), "The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28 (4), pp. 443-452.
7. Olivé J, Aparicio C, (1990), "Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5 (4), pp. 390-400.
8. Staedt H, Kämmerer P W, Goetze E, Thiem D G E, et al, (2020), "Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode - an ex vivo study", Int J Implant Dent, 6 (1), pp. 49.
9. Troiano G, Lo Russo L, Canullo L, Ciavarella D, et al, (2018), "Early and late implant failure of submerged versus non-submerged implant healing: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 45 (5), pp. 613-623.
10. van Eekeren P, Said C, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, (2015), "Resonance Frequency Analysis of Thermal Acid-Etched, Hydrophilic Implants During First 3 Months of Healing and Osseointegration in an Early-Loading Protocol", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30 (4), pp. 843-850