INTERAGREEMENT OBSERVER ON CT SCAN IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICYTIS

Đình Minh Nguyễn1,, Thu Huyền Phạm2, Thị Nga Phạm2
1 GERMANY FRIENDSHIP HOSPITAL
2 HMU

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: study the inter-observer agreement among radiologists with different level of experience in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) based on CT imaging. Subjects and methods: A comparing cross-sectional descriptive study of 60 cases with clinically suspected appendicitis, of which 30 patients with postoperative results confirming AA, who underwent abdominal CT at Viet-Duc Friendship hospital from April to October 2022. CT images were read independently by three radiologists with different levels of experience (18 years, 5 years 2 years). The inter-observe agreements in the interpretation of CT findings and the ability of diagnosis of AA among the physicians was compared. Results: 42 females and 18 males were included in the study with a mean age of 41.90 ± 21.42 years (range 5 – 93 years). The inter-observer agreement in the diagnosis of AA based on CT findings showed a good agreement among the radiologists, with kappa values ranging from good to excellent for radiologist A-B, A-C, and all three radiologists, at 0.93, 0.73, and 0.78, respectively (p<0,01).  The appendiceal enlargement had good agreement with kappa values for radiologist A-B, radiologist A-C, and all three radiologists at 0.62, 0.80, and 0.68, respectively (p<0,01). The presence of appendicolith showed good agreement between radiologist A-B and all three radiologists, with kappa values of 0.75 and 0.67, respectively (p<0,01). The signs of fluid collection, intraluminal air, and fat stranding around the appendix had moderate agreement, with kappa ranging from 0.44 to 0.57. Conclusion: There was good agreement among the radiologists in diagnosis of AA on CT scan. The appendiceal enlargement and presence of appendicolith showed good agreement too.

Article Details

References

1. Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK. Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clinical Imaging. 2012/01/01/ 2012;36(1):29-34. doi:https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.04.003
2. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. Apr 15 2020;15(1):27. doi:10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3
3. Kim J, Kim K, Kim J, et al. The learning curve in diagnosing acute appendicitis with emergency sonography among novice emergency medicine residents. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2018;46(5):305-310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22577
4. Shahbazipar M, Seyedhosseini J, Vahidi E, Motahar Vahedi HS, Jahanshir A. Accuracy of ultrasound exam performed by emergency medicine versus radiology residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Med. Aug 2019; 26(4):272-276. doi:10.1097/mej.0000000000000547
5. Doãn Văn Ngọc, Đào Danh Vĩnh, Lê Văn Khảng. Nghiên cứu giá trị của chụp Cắt lớp vi tính trong chẩn đoán viêm ruột thừa cấp. Tạp chí Điện quang và Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 07/11 2022;(10):370-375. doi:10.55046/vjrnm.10.276.2012
6. Hong HS, Cho HS, Woo JY, et al. Intra-Appendiceal Air at CT: Is It a Useful or a Confusing Sign for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis? Korean J Radiol. Jan-Feb 2016;17(1):39-46. doi:10.3348/kjr.2016.17.1.39
7. in't Hof KH, Krestin GP, Steijerberg EW, et al. Interobserver variability in CT scan interpretation for suspected acute appendicitis. Emerg Med J. Feb 2009;26(2):92-4. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.058990
8. van Randen A, Laméris W, Nio CY, et al. Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain. European Radiology. 2009/06/01 2009;19(6):1394-1407. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1294-9.