THE CHOICE OF APPROPRIATE HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING METHOD FOR PATIENTS WITH SHOCK

Tôn Ngọc Vũ Phan 1,, Đức Nam Nguyễn 1, Tấn Nguyên Phúc Lê1, Hồng Chính Lê1
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Critically ill patients are commonly hemodynamically unstable due to volume depletion, cardiac dysfunction, or altered vasomotor function, causing organ dysfunction, progression to multi-organ failure, and ultimately death. Appropriate hemodynamic monitoring helps guide therapy to prevent or treat organ failure and improve patient outcomes. Over the past decades, hemodynamic monitoring techniques have evolved toward less invasiveness as well as continuous and real-time measurements. Currently, echocardiography is the first-line modality for hemodynamic evaluation in patients with shock and should be performed early to assess cardiac structure and function. Cardiac output monitoring and advanced hemodynamic monitoring are only recommended in patients with shock unresponsive to initial therapy and/or in the most complex patients. The pulmonary artery catheter is recommended in patients with refractory shock associated with a right ventricular dysfunction. Transpulmonary thermodilution devices are recommended in patients with severe shock associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Article Details

References

1. Huygh J, Peeters Y, Bernards J, Malbrain MLNG. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: an overview of current cardiac output monitoring methods. F1000Res. 2016;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-2855. doi:10.12688/ f1000research.8991.1
2. Arya VK, Al-Moustadi W, Dutta V. Cardiac output monitoring – invasive and noninvasive. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2022;28(3):340. doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000937
3. Jozwiak M, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Less or more hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2018;24(4):309-315. doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000516
4. Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):111. doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7
5. Desai N, Garry D. Assessing dynamic fluid-responsiveness using transthoracic echocardiography in intensive care. BJA Educ. 2018;18(7):218-226. doi:10.1016/ j.bjae.2018.03.005
6. Vieillard-Baron A, Millington SJ, Sanfilippo F, et al. A decade of progress in critical care echocardiography: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(6):770-788. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05604-2
7. De Backer D, Cecconi M, Chew MS, et al. A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):372. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-04255-y
8. Monnet X, Shi R, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):46. doi:10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8