Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 132
THE FACTORS RELATED TO THE RESULTS OF FULL-ARCH IMPLANT PROTHESIS CARE ON PATIENTS IMPLANTED ALL ON X
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This research aims to investigate some factors related to the results of full-arch dental implant rehabilitation on patients received All on X Implants. Subjects and methods: A study was conducted on patients received full arch dental implants treatment (All on X) and restored according to FP3 type. A total of 31 patients participated in the study with 37 full arch dental implants and over 177 implants. The majority of the study subjects are men (71.0%); female accounts for only 29.0%. The mean age of the study group was 61.32±10.53 years old, with the youngest age being 27, the oldest being 71. Results: The rate of occurrence of peri-implant mucositis was 78.38% at the prosthesis level, 31.1% at implant level. The results show that there are many factors related to the results of the full-arch prosthesis care in patients with All on X such as prosthetic materials and prosthetic background design. The acrylic resin prostheses showed higher plaque accumulation than the ceramic prostheses. The group that designed a flat/convex, smooth prosthetic platform had a lower risk of mucositis on the implant than the group with a saddle-shaped, rough prosthetic platform. The quantity of the restorative residue is related to the inflammation of the mucosa around the implant.
Article Details
Keywords
full-arch prostheses, Implanl All on
References
2. Lobene RR, Weatherford T, Ross NM, Lamm RA, Menaker LA. A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. Clin Prev Dent. 1986;8(1):3-6.
3. Samer Abi Nader, Hazem Eimar, Moath Momani, Ke Shang, Nach G. Daniel, Faleh Tamimi. Plaque Accumulation Beneath Maxillary All-on-4™ Implant-Supported Prostheses. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2015 Oct;17(5):932-7
4. Mustafa Ayna, Fatih Karayürek2, Søren Jepsen1, Marie Emmert3, Yahya Acil3, Jörg Wiltfang3, Aydin Gülses3. Six year clinical outcomes of implant supported acrylic vs. ceramic superstructures according to the All on 4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Odontology. 2021 Oct; 109(4):930-940.
5. Masato Kanao, Tetsuji Nakamoto, Norihiro Kajiwara, Yusuke Kondo, Chihiro Masaki, Ryuji Hosokawa. Comparison of plaque accumulation and soft-tissue blood flow with the use of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses with mucosal surfaces of different materials: a randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1137-43.
6. Francisco P Curiel-Aguilera, Garth R Griffiths, Jeffrey A Rossmann, Jorge A Gonzalez. Titanium versus zirconia complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A comparison of plaque accumulation. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Dec 6;S0022-3913(21)00585-0.
7. Francine Baldin Able, Nara Hellen Campanha, Ibrahim Abazar Younes, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori. Evaluation of the intaglio surface shape of implant-supported complete-arch maxillary prostheses and its association with biological complications: An analytical cross-sectional study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug; 128(2):174-180.
8. Alexander René Schrott, Monik Jimenez, Jae-Woong Hwang, Joseph Fiorellini, Hans-Peter Weber. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft- tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct; 20(10):1170-7.
9. Konstantinos Chochlidakis, Carlo Ercoli, Erna Einarsdottir, Davide Romeo, Panos Papaspyridakos, Abdul Basir Barmak, Alexandra Tsigarida. Implant survival and biologic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep; 128(3):375-381.
10. Maria Menini, Paolo Setti, Paolo Pera, Francesco Pera, Paolo Pesce. Peri-implant Tissue Health and Bone Resorption in Patients with Immediately Loaded, Implant-Supported, Full-Arch Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul/Aug;31(4):327-333.