INSTANT IMPLANTATION RESULTS OF COSMETIC AREA IMPLANT USING ROCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE

Phú Thắng Nguyễn 1, Văn Việt Đàm 2, Văn Du Lự 3,, Đức Mạnh Hải Đặng 1
1 HMU
2 National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi
3 Nicesmile

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics, x-ray of the esthetic area and the results of immediate implant placement on patients with indications for immediate implantation using the Socket Shield technique at the Institute of Odonto-Stomatology and the Department of Implants. Dental Implants Hanoi Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital in 2022-2023. Subjects and methods: A descriptive study method of a cluster of cases. The subjects of the study were patients with damaged anterior teeth from the second premolar and indicated for immediate implantation at the Institute of Odonto-Stomatology. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 38.8 ± 11.8 years old, the youngest age was 20 years old, the oldest age was 64 years old. The most common reasons for tooth extraction were failure of root canal treatment and trauma (45.4%). The most common jaw bone density is D3 (97%). The results after surgery have good results reaching over 97%. Evaluation of cosmetic results 100% achieved good classification. Conclusion: The results of immediate implant placement using Socket Shield technique achieved a high rate (over 97%) at both 1 week after surgery, 3 months after surgery and 3 months after restoration. Cosmetic results are also highly effective: 12.2 ± 0.9 on the PES scale.

Article Details

References

1. Silva-Junior MF, Batista MJ, de Sousa M da LR. Incidence of Tooth Loss in Adults: A 4-Year Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:6074703. doi:10.1155/ 2017/ 6074703
2. Turkyilmaz I, Company AM, McGlumphy EA. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2010; 27(1): 3-10. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00294.x
3. Trombelli L, Farina R, Marzola A, Bozzi L, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Modeling and remodeling of human extraction sockets. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(7):630-639. doi:10.1111/ j.1600-051X.2008.01246.x
4. Ten Heggeler JM a. G, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):779-788. doi:10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x
5. Sculean A, Chappuis V, Cosgarea R. Coverage of mucosal recessions at dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):134-140. doi:10.1111/ prd.12178
6. Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial Extraction Therapies (PET) Part 2: Procedures and Technical Aspects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(3):377-385. doi:10.11607/ prd.3111
7. Gluckman H, Toit JD, Salama M. The socket-shield technique to support the buccofacial tissues at immediate implant placement.
8. Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(9):855-862. doi:10.1111/ j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x
9. Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm trên từng phần bằng kỹ thuật implant có ghép xương. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2013.
10. Ngô Vĩnh Phúc, Trần Tấn Tài, Huỳnh Văn Dương. Đánh giá kết quả cấy ghép nha khoa tức thì sau nhổ răng. Tạp chí Y Dược học. 2018;8 (6):196-202.