Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/12/2023
Abstract Views: 72
Views PDF: 93
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i2.7634
Issue
Vol. 532 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Cao, T. T., Nguyễn, T. B. N., CẢNH, P. M., Phạm, D., & Nguyễn, T. H. (2023). CEPHALOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTERIOR DEEPBITE PATIENTS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 532(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i2.7634

CEPHALOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTERIOR DEEPBITE PATIENTS

Thị Thuận Cao1,, Thị Bích Ngọc Nguyễn1, Phương Mai CẢNH1, Duy Phạm1, Thanh Huyền Nguyễn2
1 HMU
2 Hanoi Central Dental Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar features in patients with deep bite malocclusion. Subjects and methods: Lateral cephalograms of deep bite (n=84) subjects were used to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar variables. Results: 53 subjects (63,1%) had Class II skeletal malocclusion. Gonial angle decreased (119,5°±7,1), maxillary plane angle increased (9,7°±4,1), ratio UAFH/LAFH (0,82±0,08) and PFH/AFH (67,4%±5,7) increased. Conclusion: Reduced gonial angle and the clockwise rotation of maxilla were dominant features of deep bite malocclusion. Facial profile of patients with deep bite malocclusion was not harmonious.

Article Details

Keywords

Deepbite, Cephalometrics

References

1. Cvvr sreedhar, baratam sreenivas. Deep overbite—A review (Deep bite, Deep overbite, Excessive overbite). ANNALS AND ESSENCES OF DENTISTRY. 2009;I: 8-25. doi: 10.5368/ aedj.2009.1.1.8-25
2. Ceylan I, Eröz UB. The effects of overbite on the maxillary and mandibular morphology. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(2):110-115. doi:10.1043/0003- 3219(2001)071<0110:TEOOOT>2.0.CO;2
3. El-Dawlatly MM, Fayed MMS, Mostafa YA. Deep overbite malocclusion: analysis of the underlying components. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(4): 473-480. doi: 10.1016/ j.ajodo.2012.04.020
4. Beckmann SH, Kuitert RB, Prahl-Andersen B, Segner D, The RP, Tuinzing DB. Alveolar and skeletal dimensions associated with lower face height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(5): 498-506. doi: 10.1016/ s0889-5406 (98)70260-4
5. Sangcharearn Y, Ho C. Effect of Incisor Angulation on Overjet and Overbite in Class II Camouflage Treatment. A typodont study. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6): 1011-1018. doi: 10.2319/ 111206-460.1
6. Fattahi H, Pakshir H, Afzali Baghdadabadi N, Shahian Jahromi S. Skeletal and dentoalveolar features in patients with deep overbite malocclusion. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(6):629-638.
7. Noroozi H. A simple method of determining the bite-opening effect of posterior extrusion. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33(12):712-714.
8. Ng J, Major PW, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. True incisor intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(2): 212-219. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.025