THE REGIONAL LYMPHADENECTOMY IN ANATOMICAL RIGHT HEPATECTOMY FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

Thế Anh Phạm, Mạnh Cường Trương

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the patient characteristics underwent anatomical right hepatectomy with local lymph node resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate the impact of local lymphadenectomy to postoperative outcomes. Subjects and methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study of the cases who underwent anatomical right hepatetomy for hepatocellular carcinoma at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, K Hospital, from January 2022 to July 2023. Results: Anatomical right hepatectomy was performed for 110 patients, in which 31 patients underwent local lymphadenectomy, including lymph nodes at hepatoduodenal ligament, along common hepatic artery and retro-pancreatic space. The average age was 50,5 ± 14,6 years; 93,5% of patients were male; hepatitis B related: 38,7%. The mean AFP was 2560,1 ± 6074,9 ng/ml. Right portal vein thrombosis was seen in 2 patients (6,5%). The mean tumor size in the CT scan was 8,3 ± 3,9 cm. Takasaki’s method was the majority of extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation (80,6%). The mean operation time was 164,5 ± 41,7 min. There was no intraoperative blood transfusion. Postoperative complications occurred in 14 patients, including ascites (45,2%) and pleural effusion (3,2%). The classification of complications according to Clavien–Dindo indicated: grade I (78,6%), grade II (14,3%), and grade IIIa (7,1%). There was no perioperative mortality. The average length of hospital stay was 14,9 ± 9,9 days. Total resected lymph nodes were 128, in which metastesis was found in one lymph node (0,78%). Lymph node dissection significantly prolonged operative duration (p=0,04) and resulted in a notable increase in postoperative ascites formation (p=0,002). However, the incidence of severe postoperative complications (p=0,3) and length of hospital stay (p=0,06) remained statistically unchanged. Conclusion: Anatomical right hepatectomy with local lymph node resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is feasible, safe, and effective

Article Details

References

1. Banales J M, Marin J J, Lamarca A, et al (2020), "Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management", Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology, 17 (9), pp. 557-588.
2. Xiaohong S, Huikai L, Feng W, et al (2010), "Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma", World journal of surgery, 34, pp. 1028-1033.
3. Lê Văn Thành (2013), "Nghiên cứu chỉ định và kết quả phẫu thuật cắt gan kết hợp phương pháp Tôn Thất Tùng và Lortat Jacob trong điều trị ung thư biểu mô tế bào gan", Luận án tiến sĩ Y học - Đại học Quân Y.
4. Trịnh Quốc Đạt (2019), "Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật kiểm soát chọn lọc cuống Glisson trong cắt gan điều trị ung thư tế bào gan", Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học - Đại học Y Hà Nội.
5. Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R, et al (1999), "Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study", Annals of surgery, 229 (3), pp. 369.
6. Nanashima A, Abo T, Hamasaki K, et al (2013), "Predictors of intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing hepatectomy", Surgery today, 43 (5), pp. 485-493.
7. Vũ Văn Quang (2019), "Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật kiểm soát cuống Glisson theo Takasaki trong cắt gan điều trị ung thư biểu mô tế bào gan tại Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108", Luận án tiến sĩ Y học.
8. Karamarković A, et al (2016), "Suprahilar Control of Glissonean Pedicle in the Open Anatomic Liver Resections: A Single Centre Experience", ournal of Digestive Cancer Reports, 4 (2), pp. 113-121.
9. Curley S A, Barnett Jr C C, Abdalla E K, et al (2017), "Surgical management of potentially resectable hepatocellular carcinoma", Monografía en Internet] In: Ashley SW, Tanabe KK, editors UpTodate Walthman (MA): UpTodate.
10. Dagher I, Belli G, Fantini C, et al (2010), "Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience", Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 211 (1), pp. 16-23.