Thanh bên bài viết

PDF
Ngày xuất bản: 11/09/2021
Số lượt xem tóm tắt: 141
Số lượt xem PDF: 149
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i1-2.975
Số xuất bản
Tập 506 Số 1-2 (2021): Vietnam Medical Journal
Chuyên mục
Các bài báo
Trích dẫn bài báo
Anh Cuong, T. ., Thi Huong Lan, N. ., Wijaya, S. ., & Thu Anh, T. . (2021). EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL OBTURATION RESULTS WITH THE CANAL SHAPING SYSTEM WAVE ONE AND GUTTA THERMAFIL. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam, 506(1-2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i1-2.975

EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL OBTURATION RESULTS WITH THE CANAL SHAPING SYSTEM WAVE ONE AND GUTTA THERMAFIL

Anh Cuong Ta 1,, Thi Huong Lan Ngo 1, Wijaya Steven 1, Thu Anh Ta 1
1 108 Military Central Hospital

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objective: To evaluate the results of root canal obturation with Wave One (WO) canal shaping system and Gutta Thermafil obturation system. Design: Nonrandomized prospective experimental trial between December 2020 and March 2021. Setting: Central Military Hospital 108. Subject: 30 lower incisors extracted teeth without stem rupture, without root damage such as fracture, stray, fissure. Results: The number of slices with the biggest gaps accounting for 16.7%. The number of slices with the smallest gaps accounting for 10%. The number of slices with gaps over the total slices accounted for 14.4%. The void area in the apical slice was 1,413 ± 519.5 µm2 and the largest void area was 38,654.2 ± 3,939.8 µm2. Conclusion: Thermafil Gutta Percha has a good fit to the canal wall, which can seal the canal more easily and accurately.

Chi tiết bài viết

Từ khóa

Root canal, Wave One, Thermafil

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Bane K., Faye B., et al. (2015), “Root canal shaping by single-file systems and rotary instruments: a laboratory study”, Iranian endodontic journal, 10(2), pp.135-139.
2. Bürklein S., Hinschitza K., et al. (2012), “Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper”, International endodontic journal, 45(5), pp.449-461.
3. Castelló-Escrivá R., Alegre-Domingo T., et al. (2012), “In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files”, Journal of endodontics, 38(11), pp.1521-1524.
4. Chu C.H., Lo E.C.M., et al. (2005), “Outcome of root canal treatment using Thermafil and cold lateral condensation filling techniques”, International endodontic journal, 38(3), pp.179-185.
5. Cunha R.S., Junaid A., et al. (2014), “Assessment of the separation incidence of reciprocating WaveOne files: a prospective clinical study”, Journal of endodontics, 40(7), pp.922-924.
6. Gencoglu N., Helvacioglu D., et al. (2014), “Effect of six obturation techniques on filling of lateral canals”, J Res Pract Dent, 2014, pp.1-7.
7. Sara Gamal., et al. (2019), “Investigating the Fracture Resistance and Sealing Ability of Teeth Obturated With a Novel Carrier-Based Obturation System: Guttacore as Compared with Thermafil Obturator A Comparative In-Vitro Study”, Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 3.2, pp.68-72.
8. FRACCHIA, D., et al. (2020), GuttaCore Pink, Thermafil and Warm Vertically compacted gutta-percha retreatment: Time required and quantitative evaluation by using ProTaper files. Dental Materials Journal, 39(2), pp.229-235.
9. Abdulla, A., Elenjikal, M., Latheef, A., Kader, M., Ganapathy, S., Mohamed, A., Sainudeen, S. and Saquib, S., (2019). A comparative evaluation of five obturation techniques in the management of simulated internal resorptive cavities: An ex vivo study. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences, 11(6), p.450.
10. Vittoria, G., Pantaleo, G., Blasi, A., Spagnuolo, G., Iandolo, A. and Amato, M., (2018). Thermafil: A New Clinical Approach Due to New Dimensional Evaluations. The Open Dentistry Journal, 12(1), pp.173-180.