Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 24/07/2025
Abstract Views: 172
Views pdf: 54
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v552i2.15036
Issue
Vol. 552 No. 2 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Lê, Đức P., Nguyễn, P. V., Nguyễn, K., & Trần, H. A. (2025). OUTCOMES OF RENAL STONES 3–5 CM IN SIZE TREATMENT USING MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY AT THE MILITARY HOSPITAL 103. Vietnam Medical Journal, 552(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v552i2.15036

OUTCOMES OF RENAL STONES 3–5 CM IN SIZE TREATMENT USING MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY AT THE MILITARY HOSPITAL 103

Đức Phúc Lê, Phú Việt Nguyễn, Khánh Nguyễn, Hoàng Anh Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (mini-PCNL) for the treatment of large renal stones (3–5 cm) at Military Hospital 103. Study Design: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 57 patients with renal stones from July 2024 to May 2025 at Military Hospital 103. Results: The mean patient age was 58.3 ± 10.8 years, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2.2:1. Postoperative residual stone rate was 7.0%, and 19.3% of patients experienced Grade I complications according to the Clavien classification, primarily fever and postoperative infection (17.5%). The average postoperative blood loss follow Hemoglobin was 11.1 ± 1.4 g/L, with a statistically significant result (p < 0.05). Serum creatinine and urea levels decreased significantly after surgery compared to preoperative values. Conclusion: Mini-PCNL is efficacy and safety procedure for treatment of large renal stones (3-5cm), demonstrating reduced residual stone rates and fewer complications.

Article Details

Keywords

: Renal stone; Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

References

Nguyễn Minh An, Đặng Văn Hùng (2021), "Đánh giá kết quả điều trị sỏi thận san hô bằng phương pháp tán sỏi qua da đường hầm nhỏ tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Hải Dương năm 2020", Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 503(2), tr. 66-70.
2. Đào Mạnh Cường (2019), Kết quả tán sỏi thận qua da đường hầm nhỏ điều trị sỏi san hô, Luận văn Chuyên khoa II - Đại học Y Hà Nội.
3. A. Chewcharat, G. Curhan (2021), "Trends in the prevalence of kidney stones in the United States from 2007 to 2016", Urolithiasis. 49(1), p. 27-39.
4. Pankaj N. Maheshwari, Aditya S. Goyal, Pushkar Shrivastava (2024), "Factors impacting post-nephrostomy-tube removal urine leak after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does the calyx of access make a difference", African Journal of Urology. 30(57), p. 60-70.
5. Shakir S, Khidhur S (2022), "Effects of single versus multiple tracts on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy outcomes", Iraq Med J. 6(4).
6. K. K. Stamatelou, M. E. Francis, C. A. Jones, L. M. Nyberg, G. C. Curhan (2003), "Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994", Kidney Int. 63(5), p. 1817-23.
7. Ahmet Te, Fatih A, Kadir T, Aytul T (2007), "Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison", International Urology and Nephrology 39, p. 57-63.
8. W. Xue, D. Pacik, W. Boellaard, A. Breda, M. Botoca, J. Rassweiler, B. Van Cleynenbreugel, J. de la Rosette, Croes Pcnl Study Group (2012), "Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study", J Urol. 187(4), p. 1293-7.