EVALUATION OF CHANGES IN HEART RATE AND BLOOD PRESSURE INDICES IN PILOTS DURING A HYPERBARIC CHAMBER SIMULATION AT 5000 m ALTITUDE

Phong Nguyễn Hồng, Thức Lường Công, Thông Nguyễn Huy, Điền Nguyễn Văn, Xuân Nguyễn Thanh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of simulated hypobaric conditions (5000 m) on heart rate and blood pressure in pilots. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 75 active Vietnamese military pilots meeting inclusion criteria. Each pilot underwent measurements of continuous heart rate and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) before, during, and after exposure in a hypobaric chamber simulating 5000 m altitude. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 with repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the impact of altitude. Results: The mean age of pilots was 31.4 ± 5.9 years, BMI 22.9 ± 2.4 kg/m². Mean baseline heart rate was 80.01 ± 11.32 beats/min, which increased significantly to 91.23 ± 10.43 beats/min at 5000 m (p<0.001). The highest heart rate (93.52 ± 9.46 beats/min) occurred at 15 minutes at 5000 m, significantly higher than at ascent start or descent end (p<0.05). Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) rose from 120.40 ± 7.48 mmHg (pre-test) to 131.68 ± 8.71 mmHg at 5000 m and returned to 122.12 ± 8.75 mmHg post-test (p<0.05). Mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) similarly increased from 74.94 ± 7.06 to 81.49 ± 7.13 mmHg at altitude and decreased to 76.11 ± 7.96 mmHg after (p<0.05). Conclusions: Simulated altitude of 5000 m significantly elevated heart rate and blood pressure in pilots, though changes were moderate. These findings reflect good cardiovascular fitness and adaptation in these pilots.

Article Details

References

1. GBD 2019. Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10258): 1204 - 1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
2. Mensah GA, Roth GA, Fuster V. The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors: 2020 and Beyond. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(20): 2529-2532. doi:10.1016/j.jacc. 2019.10.009.
3. Grósz A, Tóth E, Péter I. A 10-year follow-up of ischemic heart disease risk factors in military pilots. Mil Med. 2007;172(2): 214-219. doi:10. 7205/milmed.172.2.214.
4. Siagian, M. Hypertension in Indonesian Air Force Pilots. Med J Indones. 2012; 21: 38-43.
5. Nguyễn, H. Đăng, Nguyễn, M. P., & Nguyễn, O. O. Nghiên cứu nồng độ Osteoprotegerin huyết tương ở phi công quân sự Việt Nam. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023; 529(1B). https://doi.org/ 10.51298/vmj.v529i1B.6403.
6. Varis N, Leinonen A, Parkkola K, Leino TK. Hyperventilation and Hypoxia Hangover During Normobaric Hypoxia Training in Hawk Simulator. Front Physiol. 2022;13:942249. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.942249.
7. Castro-Herrera, J.M., et al., Heart rate variability as a predictor of hypobaric hypoxia in aircraft pilots. Latin American Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 16 No. 4, 2021). 16(4).
8. Urch B, Silverman F, Corey P, et al. Acute blood pressure responses in healthy adults during controlled air pollution exposures. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(8): 1052-1055. doi:10.1289/ ehp.7785.
9. Netzer NC, Jaekel H, Popp R, et al. Oxidative Stress Reaction to Hypobaric-Hyperoxic Civilian Flight Conditions. Biomolecules. 2024;14(4):481. doi:10.3390/biom14040481.