MANDIBULAR CONDYLE HEAD FRACTURES AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 2023-2024

Trực Vũ Trung, Tài Lê Đình, Quang Nguyễn Nghĩa

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the features and treatment of patients diagnosed with mandibular condyle head fractures at the Department of Maxillofacial, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study of patients diagnosed with mandibular condyle head fractures and treated at the Department of Maxillofacial, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital from from Jan 2023 to Dec 2024. We collected data from medical records, re-examination data. Results: 126 patients with 164 mandibular condyle head fractures included in the sample, there was a male predominance at 77.8%; the range of age was from 16 to 73 years old and the mean age was 35.2 ± 14.6.  A majority of mandibular condyle head fractures were caused by road traffic accidents with the incidence of 78.6%. The incidence of right, left and bilateral fractures were 37.3%; 32.5% and 30.2%, respectively. Follow Dongmei He’ classification of the mandibular condyle head fracture were type A 23.8%; type B 43.3%; type C 15.2%; type M 17.7%. All patients underwent conservative treatment by intermaxillary fixation, no significant different was found in the result between four types of fracture. Conclusion: Mandibular condyle head fractures are mainly seen in men, the  most common cause is road traffic accidents. The conservative treatment by intermaxillary fixation revealed no significant different in the result between four types of fracture.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Hoàng Cương, Vũ Trung Trực, Nguyễn Hồng Hà (2016). Nhận xét kết quả điều trị gãy lồi cầu xương hàm dưới tại bệnh viện Việt Đức. Y học Việt Nam, tập 446 số chuyên đề, tr 246-253.
2. Boffano P, Corre P, Righi S. The Role of Intra-articular Surgery in the Management of Mandibular Condylar Head Fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;25(1): 25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2016. 10.001. Epub 2016 Dec 20. PMID: 28153180.
3. Vũ Trung Trực, Lê Trung Kiên, Nguyễn Tấn Văn (2024). Đánh giá kết quả điều trị bảo tồn gãy lồi cầu xương hàm dưới. Y học Việt Nam, 540:7 (1), tr 12-15, https://doi.org/ 10.51298/vmj.v540i1.10219.
4. He D, Yang C, Chen M, Jiang B, Wang B. Intracapsular condylar fracture of the mandible: our classification and open treatment experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1672-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.02.012. PMID: 19615581.
5. Vũ Trung Trực, Trần Ngọc Sơn, Lê Văn Quý (2025). Kết quả điều trị gãy cổ lồi cầu và dưới lồi cầu xương hàm dưới do chấn thương tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam, 550(2). https://doi.org/ 10.51298/vmj.v550i2. 14171
6. Monarchi, G., Catarzi, L., Paglianiti, M., Valassina, D., Balercia, P., & Consorti, G. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Surgical and Conservative Management in Intra-Articular Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study. Surgeries, 5(4), 1033-1042. https://doi. org/10.3390/surgeries5040083
7. Johner JP, Essig H, Neff A, Wagner MEH, Blumer M, Gander T. Volumetric Evaluated Bone Resorption After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Condylar Head Fractures of the Mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;79(9): 1902-1913. doi: 10.1016/j.joms. 2021.04.018. Epub 2021 Apr 23. PMID: 34062130.
8. He D, Yang C, Chen M, Bin J, Zhang X, Qiu Y. Modified preauricular approach and rigid internal fixation for intracapsular condyle fracture of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7): 1578-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009. 07.076. PMID: 20430506.