THE RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY WITH INTRODUCER TECHNIQUE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy using the direct introducer technique. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 34 patients who underwent percutaneous gastrostomy using the introducer technique at Bach Mai Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023. Results: The mean age was 72.1 years, with a male/female ratio of 1.8/1. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 19.3±2.7 kg/m2. Neurological diseases accounted for 73.5% of cases. The rate of systemic antibiotic use before the procedure was 91.2%. Intravenous anesthesia was used in 97.1% of patients, with one patient receiving local anesthesia. The technical success rate was 100%. The procedure time was 7.5±2.5 minutes (range: 5-10 minutes). There was one case of a complication, which involved posterior gastric wall perforation causing bleeding. Conclusion: Percutaneous gastrostomy using the introducer technique is a safe and easily performed procedure with a high success rate and a short intervention time.
Article Details
Keywords
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), introdcucer.
References
2. Russell TR, Brotman M, Norris F. Percutaneous gastrostomy. A new simplified and cost-effective technique. Am J Surg. Jul 1984; 148(1): 132-7. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(84) 90300-3
3. Wang J, Liu M, Liu C, Ye Y, Huang G. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. J Radiat Res. May 2014;55(3): 559-67. doi:10.1093/jrr/ rrt144
4. Chang WK, Huang HH, Lin HH, Tsai CL. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy versus Nasogastric Tube Feeding: Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Increases Risk for Pneumonia Requiring Hospital Admission. Nutrients. Dec 5 2019;11(12)doi:10.3390/nu11122969
5. Retes FA, Kawaguti FS, de Lima MS, et al. Comparison of the pull and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in patients with head and neck cancer. United European Gastroenterol J. Apr 2017;5(3):365-373. doi:10.1177/2050640616662160
6. Grant DG, Bradley PT, Pothier DD, et al. Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. Apr 2009;34(2): 103-12. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486. 2009.01889.x
7. Ljungdahl M, Sundbom M. Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. Aug 2006; 20(8):1248-51. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0757-6