THE NECESSITY OF EARLY ORTHODONTIC INTERVENTION IN CHILDREN WITH AN EDGE TO EDGE FIRST MOLAR RELATIONSHIP IN THE MIXED DENTITION STAGE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: An end-to-end relationship of the first permanent molar (Angle Class II 50%) is a common occlusal presentation and is generally considered normal during the mixed-dentition stage. However, if not monitored and managed early, it may progress to an abnormal molar relationship in the permanent dentition. To date, no longitudinal study in Vietnam has assessed changes in this occlusion from mixed to permanent dentition. Objectives: To evaluate the developmental progression of occlusal morphology in subjects presenting with an end-to-end R6 relationship from the mixed- to the permanent-dentition stage. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal study, 112 hemi-arches exhibiting an edge-to-edge R6 relationship in the early mixed dentition (T2) were followed until the permanent dentition stage (T3). At T2, only hemi-arches with an end-to-end first-molar relationship were included. At T3, the R6 relationship was reclassified into Angle Class I, II, or III. Results: Of the 112 hemi-arches with an initial edge-to-edge R6 relationship at T2, 84 (75%) converted to a Class I first-molar relationship by T3, while 28 (25%) progressed to Class II. Conclusion: An edge-to-edge first-molar relationship in the mixed dentition shows a high potential for spontaneous correction to Class I in most cases; however, approximately one-quarter of cases advance to Class II. Early identification and monitoring of high-risk individuals are therefore essential to facilitate timely intervention and achieve ideal molar relationships in the permanent dentition.
Article Details
Keywords
molar relationship, end-on occlusion, mixed dentition, permanent dentition, occlusal development.
References
2. Proffit WR (2007). Contemporary Orthodontics. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, 4th ed, p27-107. Mosby. Missouri.
3. Moorrees C.F.A (1959). “The dentition of the growing child: a longitudinal study of dental development between 3 and 18 years of age”. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
4. Arya BS, Savara BS (1973). Prediction of first molar occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 63:610-621.
5. Barros S.E (2015). Factors in influencing molar relationship behavior the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148:782-792.
6. Bishara SE, Hoppens BJ (1988). Changes in the molar relationship between the deciduous and permanent dentitions: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93(1):19-28.
7. Tsourakis AK, Johnston LE. Class II malocclusion: The aftermath of a “perfect storm”. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2014/03/01/ 2014;20(1):59-73.
8. Baume LJ (1950). Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. II. The biogenesis of the accessional dentition. J Dent Res, 29:331-337.