EVALUATION OF SOFT TISSUE THICKNESS IN THE MID-PALATAL REGION USING CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CBCT)

Huy Thục Mỹ Lê, Thanh Nhi Ngô

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the soft tissue thickness in the mid-palatal region using CBCT imaging to provide guidelines for selecting safe and effective sites for orthodontic mini-screw placement in Vietnamese patients. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 70 CBCT images of patients aged 15–30 years. Soft tissue thickness was measured at specific points on a grid formed by horizontal lines perpendicular to the palatal suture at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 mm posterior to the incisive foramen, and vertical lines parallel to the palatal suture at 2, 4, and 6 mm laterally. Results: The thickness of the palatal soft tissue varies by anatomical location, with a tendency to be thinnest at the midpalatal suture (1.1–1.51 mm) and progressively thicker toward the lateral aspects (1.47–3.2 mm). From anterior to posterior, the anterior palate tends to be thicker (1.44–3.2 mm), gradually thinner toward the posterior, with the thinnest area around the first maxillary molar (0.96–1.7 mm), and slightly increasing again in the posterior palate. The palatal soft tissue thickness in males tends to be greater than in females, with statistically significant differences at certain lateral positions (4 and 6 mm) at distances of 8, 12, and 20 mm from the incisive foramen (p<0.05), though the most favorable region is similar to that in females. The soft tissue thickness in the middle and posterior palate, at the midpalatal suture and 2-4 mm laterally, ranges from 1-2 mm. Conclusion: In Vietnamese people, the mid-palatal region from 8 mm to 24 mm posterior to the incisive foramen and within 2-4 mm laterally has a soft tissue thickness of 1–2 mm, which is the most favorable for stable, long-term mini-screw placement with minimal complications.

Article Details

References

1. Long H, Han X, Lai W. Clinical Insertion Techniques of Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices: John Wiley & Sons; 2024.
2. Park JH. Temporary anchorage devices in clinical orthodontics: John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
3. Kakali L, Alharbi M, Pandis N, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D. Success of palatal implants or mini-screws placed median or paramedian for the reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2019; 41(1):9-20.
4. Gupta N, Hungund S, Astekar MS, Dodani K. Evaluation of palatal mucosal thickness and its association with age and gender. Biotech Histochem. 2014;89(7):481-7.
5. Oh SH, Lee SR, Choi JY, Kim SH, Hwang EH, Nelson G. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the midpalatal suture region to facilitate orthodontic mini-implant placement. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51(4):260-9.
6. Gibas-Stanek M, Żabicki S, Urzędowski M, Pihut M. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness at the Implantation Areas of Two Popular Bone-Anchored Distalizers-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Retrospective Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(14).
7. Vu T, Bayome M, Kook YA, Han SH. Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42(6):291-6.
8. Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir A, Haghanifar S, Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir M, Rahmati-Kamel M. Individual scoring and mapping of hard and soft tissues of the anterior hard palate for orthodontic miniscrew insertion. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8(1).