THE VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE IN SITU INVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF BLADDER CANCER

Phú Phát Phạm, Thị Thúy Hằng Võ , Văn Phước Lê, Thị Kim Yến Huỳnh, Bảo Trân Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Computed Tomographyhas an important role in bladder cancer staging and clinical treatment decisions. Objective: To determine the value of Computed Tomography in the assessment of bladder cancer tumor stage compared with the pathological results. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study on 95 patients with bladder cancer who underwent CT scans by the preoperative technique and obtained pathological results. Blind reading of T stage results on CT scan according to the TNM classification of AJCC 8th edition.Compare with pathological results, calculate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value for the role of each invasive stage of CT scan. Results: CT has a high value in diagnosing the T-stage of esophageal cancer.The value of CT in diagnosing ≥T3b stage has sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of 81.8%, 93.2%, 90.5%, and 78.3%, respectively. Stage T4 sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value were 85.7%, 98.8%, 97.9%, 85.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Computed Tomography enables accurate staging of bladder cancer, particularly from stage T3b and beyond.

Article Details

References

1. Matsuda T, Ap℡ I, Exbrayat C, Grosclaude P. Determinants of quality of life of bladder cancer survivors five years after treatment in France. Int J Urol. 2003;10(8):423-429. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00657.
2. Lê Minh Hoàn, Trần Công Hoan. Giá Trị Cắt Lớp vi Tính Đa Dãy Chẩn Đoán Ung Thư Bàng Quang. Tạp Chí Điện Quang Việt Nam. 2015; (19), Tr 45-48.
3. Tekes A, Kamel IR, et al. MR Imaging Features of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(3):771-777. doi:10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800771.
4. Schmid SC, Zahel T, Haller B, et al. Prognostic value of computed tomography before radical cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: imaging predicts survival. World J Urol. 2016; 34(4): 569-576. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1654-9
5. Hua H, Gao Y, Lin J, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Enhanced Computed Tomography in Differentiating Cystitis Glandularis and Bladder Cancer. BioMed Res Int.2020;2020:4930621.doi: 10.1155/2020/4930621.
6. Oz II, Altinbas NK, et al. The Role of Computerized Tomography in the Assessment of Perivesical Invasion in Bladder Cancer. Pol J Radiol. 2016;81:281-287. doi:10.12659/ PJR.896752
7. Kundra V, Silverman PM. Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Follow-Up of Cancer of the Urinary Bladder. Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(4):1045-1054. doi:10.2214/ajr.180.4.1 801045
8. Kim JK, Park SY, Ahn HJ, Kim CS, Cho KS. Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Enhancement Pattern and Accuracy in Tumor Detection and Perivesical Staging. Radiology. 2004;231(3): 725-731. doi:10.1148/ radiol.2313021253.