EARLY RESULTS OF OFF-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL

Nguyễn Thành Luân, Trần Quyết Tiến

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Describe clinical, paraclinical characteristics, postoperative results, general complications and early hospital mortality. Methods: Descriptive cross sectional study. Results: In 141 patients (Male 81.6%). Mean age was 59.8 ± 8.3 years, History and common risk factors were hypertension 79.4%, dyslipidemia 39%, diabetes 29.1%, renal failure 49.6%. Left ventricular function: ejection fraction 53.2 ± 12.4%, Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter 53.2 ± 7.4mm. Three-vessel disease accounted for 93.6%, Left Main was 41.1%. The average operative time was 5.3 hours, the shortest was 3 hours, the longest was 8 hours. Average number of grafts 3.2 ± 0.5, conduits: 99.3% left internal mammary artery, 63.1% right internal mammary artery, 60.3% right gastroepiploic artery, 46.8% saphenous vein, 53.2% total artery bypass. Mechanical ventilation, time of resuscitation, average hospitalization time after surgery was 21.5 hours (Prolonged ventilation 20.7%); 63 hours and 10.5 days, respectively. Postoperative Inotrope and Vasopressors are mainly one or not. Hospital mortality was 2.8%. Conclusion: Off pump coronary artery bypass grafting at Cho Ray Hospital initially showed a safe and effective with acceptable mortality rate. In addition, Off-pump CABG is a challenging technique with surgeon’s experience and a steep learning curve. Off-pump CABG is an attractive strategy for treating high-risk patients and next generation of cardiac surgeons must receive structured training to perform off-pump CABG so as to deal with increasing numbers of high-risk patients.

Article Details

References

1. David P. Taggart, Mario F. Gaudino, Stephen Gerry, Alastair Gray, Belinda Lees, Lokeswara R. Sajja, Vipin Zamvar, Marcus Flather, Umberto Benedetto, 2020. Ten-year outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, ISSN 0022-5223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.035.
2. Kobayashi J 79, Sasako Y, Bando K, Niwaya K, et al, (2002), "Multiple off-pump coronary revascularization with "aorta no-touch" technique using composite and sequential methods", The heart surgery forum, 5 pp. 114-118.
3. Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Malvindi PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151: 60-77.e1-58.
4. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Offpump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1489-97.
5. Marczin, Nandor, AND Raja, Shahzad G.. "Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting" AME Medical Journal [Online], Volume 5(24 March 2020)
6. Osawa H 89, Inaba H, Kinoshita O, Akashi O, et al, (2011), "Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with an aortic nonclamping technique may reduce the incidence of cerebral complications", General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 59 (10), pp. 681.
7. Puskas JD, Mack MJ, Smith CR. On-pump versus offpump CABG. N Engl J Med 2010; 362, 851; author reply 853-4.
8. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1827-37.
9. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al. Off pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 872-82. 21) Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Kilgo P, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass disproportionately benefits highrisk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1142-7.