EFFECTS OF AMBULATORY HEMORRHOIDECTOMY UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA

Nguyên Trung Võ 1,2,, Mạnh Tuấn Hà1,2, Quốc Vinh Nguyễn1,2, Việt Tùng Lê2, Tấn Thành Nguyễn3, Ngọc Thương Nguyễn3
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital - Campus 2
3 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoids are a benign anal disease that is not fatal but greatly affects the quality of life of patients. Currently, hemorrhoidectomy is still considered the most thorough treatment for grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids or those with thromboembolic complications. With the trend towards developing day surgery to serve patients' needs and reduce medical costs, it has become urgent to develop hemorrhoidectomy during the day under local anesthesia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 55 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia and 48 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia at the Department of General Surgery, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City - Branch 2, between January 2018 to December 2022. Results: There was no difference in pain score according to the NRS scale and satisfaction level between the two study groups. However, postoperative urinary retention complications were recorded in the spinal anesthesia group at a rate of 6.3%, in contrast to none in the local anesthesia group (p=0.01). The operative time, overall hospital stay, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer in the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.001). The total hospital discharge costs of patients in the local anesthesia group were significantly lower than those in the spinal anesthesia group (7,685,055 ± 2,122,364 VND compared to 9,108,330 ± 2,267,286 VND, p=0.001, t-test). Conclusions: Hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia has no postoperative complications, shorter hospital stay, and lower medical costs than spinal anesthesia. The method of local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation has shown feasibility in clinical practice.

Article Details

References

1. Ryu HY, Kim JY, Lim HK, et al. Bupivacaine induced cardiac toxicity mimicking an acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48(2):331-336. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.2.331.
2. Argov S, Levandovsky O. Radical, ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia. The American Journal of Surgery. 2001;182(1):69-72. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00649-3.
3. Argov S, Levandovsky O, Yarhi D. Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia — an old operation that stood the test of time: A single-team experience with 2,280 operations. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(7):981-985. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1426-6.
4. Bansal H, Jenaw RK, Mandia R, Yadav R. How to do Open Hemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia and its Comparison with Spinal Anesthesia. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(4):330-333. doi:10.1007/s12262-012-0438-3.
5. Anannamcharoen S, Cheeranont P, Boonya-usadon C. Local perianal nerve block versus spinal block for closed hemorrhoidectomy: a ramdomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai.
6. Lacerda-Filho A, Cunha-Melo JR. Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia. Eur J Surg. 1997;163(12):935-940.