Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 09/09/2023
Abstract Views: 360
Views pdf: 135
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v529i2.6524
Issue
Vol. 529 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Lê, G. Ánh T., Lê, M. K., Bùi, H. T. K., Đỗ, P. H., Võ , T. P., & Võ , T. T. (2023). CADAVERIC STUDY USE REFERENCE POINTS AS LANDMARK FOR LOCKING PLATE SYSTEM POSITION IN PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES. Vietnam Medical Journal, 529(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v529i2.6524

CADAVERIC STUDY USE REFERENCE POINTS AS LANDMARK FOR LOCKING PLATE SYSTEM POSITION IN PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES

Gia Ánh Thỳ Lê1, Minh Khoa Lê2, Hồng Thiên Khanh Bùi2, Phước Hùng Đỗ2, Toàn Phúc Võ 3, Thành Toàn Võ 4,
1 Ho Chi Minh City Hospital of Trauma and Orthopedics
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
3 Student at St. Mark's School, MA
4 Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the optimal plate plaCement using the first


and seCond PHILOS plate resemble by identifying the proximal portion of biCipital grooVe, the most prominent of the lesser tuberosity, and the upper border of peCtoralis major tendon as surgiCal landmarks.Methods: The study was Carried out by a Cross-seCtional on 30 shoulder of 15 CadaVeriC patients, at the Department of Anatomy, UniVersity of MediCine and PharmaCy at Ho Chi Minh City in 2020. Results: Using the proximal portion of biCipital grooVe, the most prominent of the lesser tuberosity as landmarks, distanCe from the margin of plate to the upper border of greater tuberosity when using 1st generation PHILOS plate is 7.84 ± 1.62 mm and 8.61


± 1.64 mm, respeCtiVely, and when using the 2nd generation PHILOS plate is 12.30 ± 3.26 mm and


13.50 ± 2.13 mm, respeCtiVely; distanCe from the CalCar sCrew to the inferolateral border of humeral head when using 1st generation PHILOS plate is 7.30


± 1.50 mm and 6.40 ± 1.66 mm, respeCtiVely, and when using the 2nd generation PHILOS plate is 4.81 ±


1.64 mm and 3.72 ± 1.46 mm, respeCtiVely. Conclusion: the proximal portion of biCipital grooVe, the most prominent of the lesser tuberosity, and the upper border of peCtoralis major tendon Can be used as landmark for proper position of 1st and 2nd generation PHILOS plate. The highest probability of CalCar sCrew in proper loCation when this distanCe is from 23mm to 25mm.

Article Details

Keywords

proximal humeral fraCture, proximal portion of biCipital grooVe, the most prominent of the lesser tuberosity, upper border of peCtoralis major tendon.

References

1. Launonen AP, Lepola V, Saranko A, Flinkkilä T, Laitinen M, Mattila VM. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fraCtures. ArCh Osteoporos. 2015;10:20.
2. Shah KN, Sobel AD, Paxton ES. Fixation of a proximal humerus fraCture using a polyaxial loCking plate and endosteal fibular strut. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:S8-9.
3. Noak LL, Dehghan N, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. Plate fixation for management humerus fraCtures. Injury. 2018;49:S33–8.
4. Schumaier A, Grawe B (2018) Proximal humerus fraCture: eValuation and management in elderly patient. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 9:1–11.
5. Kavuri V, Bowden B, Kumar N, Cerynik D. CompliCations assoCiated with loCking plate of proximal humerus fraCtures. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52:108–16.
6. Qiang M, Jia X, Chen Y, Zhang K, Li H, Jiang Y, Zhang Y. Assessment of sCrew length of proximal humerus internal loCking system (PHILOS) plate for proximal humerus fraCtures using three-dimensional imputed tomography Can. Med SCi Monit. 2018;24:158–65.
7. Jabran A, Peach C, Zou Z, Ren L.
BiomeChaniCal Comparison of sCrewbased zoning



of PHILOS and Fx humerus plates. BMC MusCuloskeletDisord. 2018;19:253.
8. Kulkamthorn N, Rungrattanawilai N, Tarunotai T, Chuvetsereporn N, Chansela P, Phruetthiphat OA. The proximal humeral loCking plate positioning to the peCtoralis major tendon in aChieVing the proper CalCar sCrew loCation: a CadaVeriC study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 4;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02892-7.
9. AO Foundation (2020) AO Surgery ReferenCe, online referenCe in CliniCal life,

https://www2.aofoundation.org
10. Padegimas EM, Zmistowski B, Lawrence C, Palmquist A, Nicholson TA, Namdari S. Defining optimal CalCar sCrew positioning in proximal humerus fraCture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 NoV;26(11):1931-1937.
11. Depuy Synthes (2010) Part of the DePuy Synthes LoCking Compression Plate (LCP®) System-3.5 mm LCP® PeriartiCular Proximal Humerus Plate-SurgiCal TeChnique, http://synthes.Vo.llnwd.net/