RESULT OF RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC - ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 2 YEARS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the result of retroperitoneal laparoscopic – assisted pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years. Patients and method: retrospective study 31 patients with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) younger than 2 years, who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic – assisted pyeloplasty in Pediatric and Neonatal surgery department, Viet Duc University Hospital from 01/01/2020 to 30/06/2023. Result: The mean age at surgery was 7.1 ± 3.8 months. There were 26 patients (83,9%) having prenatal diagnosis. All patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic with 3 trocars to dissect and pull out the uretero-pelvic junction and Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Average operative time was 74,8 ± 35.4 minutes, the average length of incision was 2,1 ± 0,2 cm. No intraoperative complications were reported. 3 patients had urine leak and 1 patient had infective incision post operation but all were treated successful with medical treatment. 3-6 months follow-up shown that improvement in uteropelvic dilation and renal parenchyma in ultrasound was statistical significance (p<0.05). 80.6 % patient had good result and the recurrent rate was 6.5%. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic – assisted pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years is safe and effective.
Article Details
Keywords
uretero-pelvic junction obstruction, Pelvi-ureteric
References
2. Fernández-Ibieta M, Nortes-Cano L, Guirao-Piñera MJ, Zambudio- Carmona G, Ruiz-Jiménez JI. Radiation-free monitoring in the long-term follow-up of pyeloplasty: Are ultrasound new parameters good enough to evaluate a successful procedure? Journal of pediatric urology. 2016;12(4):230.e1-7.
3. Kiblawi R, Kuebler JF, Petersen C, Ure BM, Hofmann AD. Ultrasound Monitoring after Pelvis-Sparing Dismembered Pyeloplasty: High Sensitivity and Low Specificity for the Success of Operation. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 2020;30(1):21-26
4. Lưu Văn Thanh. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật tạo hình điều trị hẹp khúc nối bể thận niệu quản ở trẻ 12 tháng tuổi tại bệnh viện Việt Đức. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2020.
5. Chacko JK, Koyle MA, Mingin GC, Furness PD, 3rd. The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty. Journal of pediatric urology. 2006;2(4):368-72.
6. Salama AK, Szymanski KM, Casey J, Roth J, Whittam B, Cain MP. Use of retrograde pyelogram to plan for miniature open incision in pediatric pyeloplasty. Journal of pediatric urology. 2020;16(4):479.e1-479.e5.
7. Dương Hoàng Mai. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị hẹp khúc nối bể thận - niệu quản ở trẻ em có sử dụng thông JJ. Luận văn Bác sĩ Nội trú. Đại học Y Dược TP Hồ Chí Minh; 2016
8. Tanash MA, Bollu BK, Naidoo R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16443. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2023;n/a(n/a)
9. Chan YY, Durbin-Johnson B, Sturm RM, Kurzrock EA. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions. Journal of pediatric urology. 2017;13(1):49. e1-49. e6
10. Chertin B, Raisin G, Puri P. Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. In: Puri P, ed. Pediatric Surgery: Pediatric Urology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2023:233-248