RESULT OF RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC - ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 2 YEARS

Việt Hoa Nguyễn, Quang Hùng Phạm, Bích Ngọc Nguyễn, Hồng Tuân Vũ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the result of retroperitoneal laparoscopic – assisted pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years. Patients and method: retrospective study 31 patients with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) younger than 2 years, who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic – assisted pyeloplasty in Pediatric and Neonatal surgery department, Viet Duc University Hospital from 01/01/2020 to 30/06/2023. Result: The mean age at surgery was 7.1 ± 3.8 months. There were 26 patients (83,9%) having prenatal diagnosis. All patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic with 3 trocars to dissect and pull out the uretero-pelvic junction and Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Average operative time was 74,8 ± 35.4 minutes, the average length of incision was 2,1 ± 0,2 cm. No intraoperative complications were reported. 3 patients had urine leak and 1 patient had infective incision post operation but all were treated successful with medical treatment. 3-6 months follow-up shown that improvement in uteropelvic dilation and renal parenchyma in ultrasound was statistical significance (p<0.05). 80.6 % patient had good result and the recurrent rate was 6.5%. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic – assisted pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years is safe and effective.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Thị Mai Thủy. Nghiên cứu tác dụng phẫu thuật nội soi sau phúc mạc điều trị hẹp khúc nối bể thận-niệu quản ở trẻ em dưới 5 tuổi. Luận án Tiến sỹ Y học. Học viện Quân y; 2016.
2. Fernández-Ibieta M, Nortes-Cano L, Guirao-Piñera MJ, Zambudio- Carmona G, Ruiz-Jiménez JI. Radiation-free monitoring in the long-term follow-up of pyeloplasty: Are ultrasound new parameters good enough to evaluate a successful procedure? Journal of pediatric urology. 2016;12(4):230.e1-7.
3. Kiblawi R, Kuebler JF, Petersen C, Ure BM, Hofmann AD. Ultrasound Monitoring after Pelvis-Sparing Dismembered Pyeloplasty: High Sensitivity and Low Specificity for the Success of Operation. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 2020;30(1):21-26
4. Lưu Văn Thanh. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật tạo hình điều trị hẹp khúc nối bể thận niệu quản ở trẻ 12 tháng tuổi tại bệnh viện Việt Đức. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2020.
5. Chacko JK, Koyle MA, Mingin GC, Furness PD, 3rd. The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty. Journal of pediatric urology. 2006;2(4):368-72.
6. Salama AK, Szymanski KM, Casey J, Roth J, Whittam B, Cain MP. Use of retrograde pyelogram to plan for miniature open incision in pediatric pyeloplasty. Journal of pediatric urology. 2020;16(4):479.e1-479.e5.
7. Dương Hoàng Mai. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị hẹp khúc nối bể thận - niệu quản ở trẻ em có sử dụng thông JJ. Luận văn Bác sĩ Nội trú. Đại học Y Dược TP Hồ Chí Minh; 2016
8. Tanash MA, Bollu BK, Naidoo R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16443. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2023;n/a(n/a)
9. Chan YY, Durbin-Johnson B, Sturm RM, Kurzrock EA. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions. Journal of pediatric urology. 2017;13(1):49. e1-49. e6
10. Chertin B, Raisin G, Puri P. Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. In: Puri P, ed. Pediatric Surgery: Pediatric Urology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2023:233-248