Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/09/2021
Abstract Views: 171
Views PDF: 177
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v505i1.1036
Issue
Vol. 505 No. 1 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Công Long, N. ., Quang Huy, C. ., & Trường Khanh, V. . (2021). ETIOLOGIES AND CLINICAL CHARASTERISTICS OF CEPHALITIS IN CHILDREN OF AN GIANG PROVINCE. Vietnam Medical Journal, 505(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v505i1.1036

ETIOLOGIES AND CLINICAL CHARASTERISTICS OF CEPHALITIS IN CHILDREN OF AN GIANG PROVINCE

Nguyễn Công Long1,, Chử Quang Huy2, Vũ Trường Khanh1
1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bach Mai Hospital
2 National Lung Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To identify imaging characteristics of endoscopic and endoscopic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in gastric. Subjects and methods:  Patients who had gastric stromal tumors diagnosed by Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or surgery were enrolled. The EUS images, procedure records and tissue histopathology were reviewed. All patients were positive for C-kit, CD34. Results: Of the 28 patients enrolled, 10 were males, and 18 were females. The mean size of lesion was 3.94 ± 0.73 cm (ranged from 1.8 to 6.2 cm).  In total, 75%, 21.4%, and 3.6 % tumors originated from muscularis mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria, respectively. 50% and 46.4% of these lesions were characterized by hypoechoic, heterogeneous respectively.  Conclusion: The preliminary results show that most of the GISTs originated from muscularis mucosa with characterized by hypoechoic.  

Article Details

Keywords

GIST, gastric, endoscopic ultrasonography

References

1. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. The American journal of surgical pathology 2005, 29(1):52-68.
2. Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB: American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 2006, 130(7):2217-2228.
3. Sepe PS, Brugge WR: A guide for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology 2009, 6(6):363-371.
4. Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui N, Oya M, Akinaga R, Kubokawa M, Motomura Y, Honda K, Watanabe M, Nagaie T: Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 2007, 13(14):2077-2082.
5. Di Vita M, Zanghì A, Cavallaro A, Cardì F, Uhlig M, Ursi P, Lo Menzo E, Panebianco V, Cappellani A: Gastric GIST and prognostic models. Which is the best to predict survival after surgery? Annali italiani di chirurgia 2019, 90:31-40.
6. Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recent advances in understanding of their biology. Human pathology 1999, 30(10):1213-1220.
7. Martínez-Ares D, Souto-Ruzo J, Yáñez López J, Vázquez Iglesias JL: Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of submucosal digestive tumours. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva 2005, 97(6):416-426.
8. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Roseau G, Barbier JP: Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut 2000, 46(1):88-92.
9. Shah P, Gao F, Edmundowicz SA, Azar RR, Early DS: Predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using endoscopic ultrasound. Digestive diseases and sciences 2009, 54(6):1265-1269.