Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 22/07/2024
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v540i3.10517
Issue
Vol. 540 No. 3 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hồ, Y. C., Nguyễn , Đức P., & Hoàng , B. H. (2024). VALUE OF NEWS2 AND LqSOFA SCORES IN PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. Vietnam Medical Journal, 540(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v540i3.10517

VALUE OF NEWS2 AND LqSOFA SCORES IN PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Yên Ca Hồ, Đức Phúc Nguyễn , Bùi Hải Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating the value of NEWS2 and LqSOFA scores in the prognosis of sepsis patients in the Emergency Department. Subjects and Method: Descriptive study, conducted on sepsis patients at the Emergency Department of Nghe An General Friendship Hospital from May to September 2023. Results: The 290 patients studied had an average age of 67.89 ± 16.87; 45.5% of patients had septic shock; mortality rate was 44.1%. Mean LqSOFA and NEWS2 scores were 3.07 ± 0.84 and 11.36 ± 3.61; mean scores of survival group were 2.77 ± 0.84 and 9.96 ± 3.55; death group were 3.45 ± 0.66 and 13.12 ± 2.85. AUC values of LqSOFA and NEWS2 scores in the prognosis of mortality: 0.722 and 0.757; septic shock: 0.717 and 0.751. Sensitivity and specificity of Lq SOFA >3 in the prognosis of mortality were 54.69% and 80.86%; Sensitivity and specificity of NEWS2 > 10 in the prognosis of mortality were 83.59% and 56.17%. The study showed that the LqSOFA and NEWS2 scores both had high predictive value for the prognosis of mortality than that of qSOFA, in which the NEWS2 score had a higher value.

Article Details

Keywords

LqSOFA, NEWS2, sepsis

References

1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
2. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021; 47(11): 1181-1247. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
3. Wardi G, Tainter CR, Ramnath VR, et al. Age-related incidence and outcomes of sepsis in California, 2008–2015. J Crit Care. 2021;62:212-217. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.12.015.
4. Lê Thị Xuân Thảo (2018), “Mối liên quan giữa nồng độ lactat máu, procalcitonin, c-reactive protein ở bệnh nhân nhiẽm khuẩn huyết và nhiễm khuẩn huyết có sốc tại Bệnh viện đa khoa Đồng Tháp”, Tạp chí Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 22(2), tr. 229-235.
5. Tôn Thanh Trà (2014), “Đặc điểm Bạch cầu, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin, Lactate máu trên bệnh nhân Nhiễm khuẩn huyết/Sốc nhiễm khuẩn tại khoa Cấp cứu”, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, Tập 18, Phụ bản của Số 1, 279-283.
6. Mellhammar L, Linder A, Tverring J, et al. NEWS2 is Superior to qSOFA in Detecting Sepsis with Organ Dysfunction in the Emergency Department. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1128. doi:10. 3390/jcm8081128.
7. Moreno-Torres V, Royuela A, Múñez E, et al. Better prognostic ability of NEWS2, SOFA and SAPS-II in septic patients. Med Clínica Engl Ed. 2022;159(5):224-229. doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2021.10.017.
8. Melero-Guijarro L, Sanz-García A, Martín-Rodríguez F, et al. Prehospital qSOFA, mSOFA, and NEWS2 performance for sepsis prediction: A prospective, multi-center, cohort study Front Med. 2023;10. Accessed January 28, 2024. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fme.2023.1149736.
9. Shetty A, MacDonald SP, Williams JM, et al. Lactate ≥2 mmol/L plus qSOFA improves utility over qSOFA alone in emergency department patients presenting with suspected sepsis. Emerg Med Australas EMA. 2017;29(6):626-634. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12894.
10. Hu H, Jiang JY, Yao N. Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients: A retrospective observational study. World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(2):114-119. doi:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.027.