EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF REHABILITATION AFTER CLAVICLE PLATE FIXATION SURGERY AT VIET DUC HOSPITAL

Duy Hiếu Bùi, Thị Kim Liên Nguyễn , Thị Hải Vân Pham

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation exercises for patients after clavicle plate fixation surgery. Methods: The study used an uncontrolled longitudinal study design, conducted for 12 months at Viet Duc Friendship Hospital on 93 patients who met the selection criteria. The output results were upper limb function including range of motion of the shoulder on the side of the clavicle fracture, and the Constant – Murley scale. Patients were evaluated before intervention, 1 month and 3 months after discharge. Results: Ninety-three patients, mainly men, young, had clavicle fractures due to traffic accidents, on the dominant hand and in the middle 1/3 of the collarbone. The average hospital stay was 5.8 (4.0) days. Patients achieved improvement in both range of motion and function according to Constant-Murley over time (p<0.001). Most patients achieve maximum shoulder range of motion and a Constant-Murley score of good or better after 3 months. No patient reported complications at the fracture site. Conclusion: Early mobilization and rehabilitation exercises are beneficial for patients after clavicle plate fixation surgery with the goal of returning to activities and sports as before the incident.

Article Details

References

1. Lädermann A, Abrassart S, Denard PJ, Tirefort J, Nowak A, Schwitzguebel AJ. Functional recovery following early mobilization after middle third clavicle osteosynthesis for acute fractures or nonunion: A case-control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(6):885-889. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.021
2. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):452-456.
3. Liu W, Xiao J, Ji F, Xie Y, Hao Y. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for nonunion after nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101(2):197-200.
4. Catapano M, Hoppe D, Henry P, Nam D, Robinson LR, Wasserstein D. Healing, Pain and Function after Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Systematic Review of Treatment with Immobilization and Rehabilitation. PM&R. 2019;11(4):401-408. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12065
5. Ranalletta M, Rossi LA, Piuzzi NS, Bertona A, Bongiovanni SL, Maignon G. Return to sports after plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(3): 565-569. doi:10.1177/ 0363546514559913
6. Melean PA, Zuniga A, Marsalli M, et al. Surgical treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized trial in a working compensation population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(4):587-592. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.041
7. Robertson GAJ, Wood AM. Return to sport following clavicle fractures: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2016;119(1):111-128. doi:10.1093/ bmb/ldw029
8. Su F, Allahabadi S, Bongbong DN, Feeley BT, Lansdown DA. Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021;14(1):27-46. doi:10. 1007/s12178-020-09684-2
9. Pal C, Shakunt R, Kumar D, Goyal A, Tyagi A, Pippal T. Functional outcome of conservative and surgical management in mid-third clavicle fractures. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015;8:11. doi:10.4103/0975-7341.183957
10. Lee JS, Koo BI, Shin MJ, Chang JH, Kim SY, Ko HY. Differences in Urodynamic Variables for Vesicoureteral Reflux Depending on the Neurogenic Bladder Type. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38(3): 347-352. doi:10.5535/arm.2014. 38.3.347