Article Sidebar
Date Published:
07/09/2024
Abstract Views: 47
Views pdf: 26
Views pdf: 26
Issue
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Bùi, M. H., Đào, X. T., Dương, Đức H., Nguyễn, H. H., Nguyễn, T. A., Đào, X. C., Nguyễn, T. T., Lê, Q. A. T., & Phạm, T. V. (2024). FEASIBILITY STUDY OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC OPERATIVE REPORT USING INTEROPERABLE STANDARDS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 541(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v541i3.10854
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC OPERATIVE REPORT USING INTEROPERABLE STANDARDS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The shift from narrative to eletronic operative report is increasingly recognized for its potential to standardize surgical records, enhance data quality, and improve patient care. This feasibility study aims to evaluate the design and implementation of electronic operative report using interoperable standards. We explore the technical, clinical, and logistical aspects, addressing challenges and best practices. Findings reveal the potential for improving surgical records and data exchange by adhering to standardized structures, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in achieving successful integration.
Article Details
References
1. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Beebe C, Biron PV, Boyer SL, Essin D, Kimber E, et al. The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:552–69.
2. International Standard Organisation. ISO/TC 215 Health Informatics. 1998.
3. Hoerbst A, Ammenwerth E. Electronic health records. A systematic review on quality requirements. Methods Inf Med. 2010; 49(4):320-36.
4. Mitchell EL, Lee DY, Arora S et al. Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference: a prospective intervention study. Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):824-30.
5. Brovman EY, Preiss D, Urman RD, Gross WL. The challenges of implementing electronic health records for anesthesia use outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Aug;29(4):531-5.
6. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology; Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011 Nov 10.
7. Renshaw AA, Mena-Allauca M, Gould EW, Sirintrapun SJ. Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-9.
8. Layla Basheer Alenazi, Majed Mubarak Alanzi et al. Interdisciplinary Collaboration In Healthcare Management: Integrating Health Informatics And Health Services Management For Organizations Success. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2022;31:181-191.
2. International Standard Organisation. ISO/TC 215 Health Informatics. 1998.
3. Hoerbst A, Ammenwerth E. Electronic health records. A systematic review on quality requirements. Methods Inf Med. 2010; 49(4):320-36.
4. Mitchell EL, Lee DY, Arora S et al. Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference: a prospective intervention study. Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):824-30.
5. Brovman EY, Preiss D, Urman RD, Gross WL. The challenges of implementing electronic health records for anesthesia use outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Aug;29(4):531-5.
6. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology; Institute of Medicine. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011 Nov 10.
7. Renshaw AA, Mena-Allauca M, Gould EW, Sirintrapun SJ. Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-9.
8. Layla Basheer Alenazi, Majed Mubarak Alanzi et al. Interdisciplinary Collaboration In Healthcare Management: Integrating Health Informatics And Health Services Management For Organizations Success. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2022;31:181-191.