THE RATE OF RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE PARALYSIS IN ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH THREE FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA AT HA NOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

Hoàng Nguyễn, Doãn Đông Trịnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the clinical, paraclinical and rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in patients undergoing esophagectomy with three field lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Methods: A prospective descriptive study on 16 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and three field lymphadenectomy. Results and discussion: Mean age 59.75 ± 6.96. All of the patients are male. The middle third of the tumor accounted for 56.2%, the lower third accounted for 48.2%. Stages IIB and IIIB accounted for the most 31.5%, stages IA, IB, IIA all accounted for 12.5%. The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis was 7 patients, accounting for 35%. Of which, the rate of complete recovery 1 month after surgery had 4 cases, accounting for 57.1%, the rate of incomplete paralysis had 1 case, accounting for 14.3%, and the rate of complete paralysis after had 2 cases, accounting for 28.6%. Conclusions: The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in our research is a quite high, accounting 35%. The rate of complete paralysis after one month surgery was 28.6%, the remaining 71% are incomplete paralysis and  totally recovered after surgery.

Article Details

References

1. Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85(6):840-844. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00663.x
2. Booka E, Takeuchi H, Nishi T, et al. The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Survivals After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(33):e1369. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000001369
3. Berger AC, Farma J, Scott WJ, et al. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2005;23(19):4330-4337. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.017
4. Li B, Hu H, Zhang Y, et al. Three-field versus two-field lymphadenectomy in transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: short-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2020;107(6):647-654. doi:10.1002/bjs.11497
5. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240(6):962-972; discussion 972-974. doi: 10.1097/01.sla. 0000145925.70409.d7
6. Murakami M, Otsuka K, Goto S, Ariyoshi T, Yamashita T, Aoki T. Thoracoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the left lateral decubitus position: a single center retrospective analysis of 654 patients. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):748. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3743-1
7. Otsuka K, Murakami M, Goto S, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection without recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(6):2749-2757. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07372-3
8. Scholtemeijer MG, Seesing MFJ, Brenkman HJF, Janssen LM, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: incidence, management, and impact on short- and long-term outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9 (Suppl 8): S868-S878. doi:10.21037/ jtd.2017.06.92
9. Taniyama Y, Miyata G, Kamei T, et al. Complications following recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection in oesophageal cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(1):41-46. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivu336