INITIAL RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY TO TREATMENT INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION AFTER SURGERY

Kim Vũ Lê , Quốc Ái Đặng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for postoperative bowel obstruction at Hospital E. Materials and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study, patients undergoing surgery to treated postoperative bowel obstruction from 2019 to 2023. Results: There were 50 patients diagnosed with post-operative bowel obstruction and treated with surgery, the mean age was 62 ± 20 (14-90) years old, of which 44% were male and 56% were female. The average number of abdominal surgeries in the history of patients was 1.30 ± 0.58 times, 78% of patients had one abdominal operation and obstetrics and gynecology was the largest number of surgeries in history with 32%. The common old incision in these patients is the midline incision. The cause of intestinal obstruction is mainly ligaments and adhesions, accounting for 67%. Mainly patients undergoing open surgery accounted for 54%, 46% laparoscopic surgery of which 30% had complete laparoscopic surgery, 16% of patients required assisted open surgical intervention. The overall mean operating time was 103.2 ± 51.4 (30 to 285) minutes, of which the operating time of the fully open surgery group was 116.9 ± 50.8, of the laparoscopic surgery group was 87.2 ± 48.4. There are 8% of cases of accidental tearing of the small intestinal muscle wall during surgery, 2% of accidents have intestinal perforation. There was one case of complications of postoperative bleeding from mesenteric blood vessels requiring 2nd surgery to handle complications. The average postoperative median time is 3.2 ± 1.2 days, the average hospital stay is 11.4 ± 4.9 days. 78% of postoperative results were good, only 2% had bad results due to postoperative complications that required re-operation to treat the lesion. Conclusions: The initial results of surgical treatment of pos-toperative intestinal obstruction are mostly good. In which, laparoscopic surgery has many advantages compared to open surgery such as less pain after surgery, early recovery, and short hospital stay.

Article Details

References

1. Cox. M. R., Gunn. I. F., Eastman. M. C., et al (1993), The safety and duration of non-operative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction, Aust N Z J Surg, 63 (5), pp. 367-371.
2. Ayman H, Sarwat A, Naser Z (2004). Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction with the ultrasonically activated shears, Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 23 (1), pp. 14-19.
3. Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, Gordon PH (2000). Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg, 87(9):1240-7.
4. Nguyễn Văn Hải, Lê Huy Lưu, Nguyễn Hồng Sơn (2008), “Hiệu quả phẫu thuật nội soi trong điều trị tắc ruột sau mổ”, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, 12(1), 154-160.
5. Fevang. B. T. S., Fevang. J., Lie. S. A., et al (2004), Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction, Ann Surg, 240 (2), pp. 193-201(2).
6. Ten Broek RP, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, et al (2018). Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg, 13:1-13.
7. Dương Trọng Hiền (2014). Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu thuật nội soi trong điều trị tắc ruột sau mổ. Luận án tiến sỹ chuyên ngành Ngoại khoa Đại học Y Hà Nội tr. 94-125.
8. Đặng Ngọc Hùng (2016). Nghiên cứu chỉ định và đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị tắc ruột sau mổ. Luận án tiến sỹ chuyên ngành Ngoại khoa Trường đại học Y dược Huế; tr.91-126.
9. Sallinen V, Di Saverio S, Haukijärvi E, et al (2019). Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for adhesive small bowel obstruction (LASSO): an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 4(4):278-286.
10. Nguyễn Hồng Sơn, Nguyễn Văn Hải, Lê Huy Lưu (2010), “Kết quả của phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị tắc ruột sau mổ”, Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh, 14 (4), tr. 1-7.