COMPARISON BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL END TO END ANASTOMOSIS AND OVERLAP METHOD FOR ESOPHAGOJEJUNOSTOMY AFTER TOTALLY LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER

Duy Long Võ, Quang Đạt Trần, Viết Hải Nguyễn , Quang Thông Đặng, Thuỳ Nguyên Đoàn , Năm Thắng Nguyễn , Hoàng Bắc Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

anastomosis (FEEA) and overlap methods for reconstruction after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) are technically challenges. We developed a T-shaped FEEA to facilitate technique. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between the T-shaped FEEA and overlap methods after TLTG for gastric cancer (GC). Method: This cohort study enrolled 84 patients who underwent TLTG for GC using linear stapler for reconstruction between August-2015 and October-2020. Among them, 40 patients underwent FEEA, while 44 patients underwent overlap method. Short-term outcomes encompassed operative characteristics, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Long-term outcomes included anastomosis-related complications and 1-year nutritional status. Oncologic outcomes were assessed regarding 1-, 3-, and 5- year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: There were no significant differences between the T-shaped FEEA and overlap methods in terms of the early surgical outcomes such as operating time, time of performing anastomosis, time of the first flatus, overall morbidities and mortality, and postoperative hospital stays. The esophagojejunostomy leakage and stenosis rates were similar between the groups (5.0% and 2.6% vs. 6.8% and 0.0%, respectively). The changing of reduction in weight, hemoglobin level, and albumin after 1-year postoperation were equivalent. Five-year OS and DFS were comparable between the two groups (70% and 57% vs. 51% and 41%, respectively). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes and long-term survival between the modified FEEA and overlap methods. The T-shaped FEEA may be an alternative method for reconstruction after TLTG for GC.

Article Details

References

1. Lee TG, Lee IS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the overlap method; early outcomes of 50 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3186-3190.
2. Kim HS, Kim MG, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using endoscopic linear stapler: early experiences at one institute. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:889-897.
3. Ebihara Y, Okushiba S, Kawarada Y, Kitashiro S, Katoh H. Outcome of functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:475-479.
4. Piessen G, Triboulet JP, Mariette C. Reconstruction after gastrectomy: which technique is best? J Visc Surg 2010;147:e273-283.
5. Lee S, Lee H, Song JH, Choi S, Cho M, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler in laparoscopic total gastrectomy: comparison with circular stapling technique. BMC Surg 2020;20:100.
6. Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Tanaka K, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Noji T, Nakamura T, Murakami S, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, et al. A Multicenter Retrospective Study Comparing Surgical Outcomes Between the Overlap Method and Functional Method for Esophagojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021;32:89-95.
7. Ko CS, Gong CS, Kim BS, Kim SO, Kim HS. Overlap method versus functional method for esophagojejunal reconstruction using totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2021;35:130-138.
8. Yang HK, Hyung WJ, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Cho GS, Kwon OK, Kong SH, Kim HI, Lee HJ, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes among different methods of esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I proximal gastric cancer: results of a single-arm multicenter phase II clinical trial in Korea, KLASS 03. Surg Endosc 2021;35:1156-1163.