STUDY ON MEASUREMENT METHODS OF ANTHROPOMETRY OF NASAL AND FACE, APPLICATION INTO PLASTIC AND COSMETIC SURGERY

Nguyễn Anh Tuấn Hồ, Thanh Vân Nguyễn, Đăng Diệu Phạm, Đăng Khoa Trần, Gia Vinh Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Compare direct and indirect nasal anthropometric measurement methods through standardized photographs and determine the correlation between these two methods. Method: This is a cross-sectional study of students studying at Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine from May 2019 to January 2021. The anthropometric dimensions of the nasal radix were measured directly on students and indirectly through standardized photos using Image J software at Ho Chi Minh City University of Technical Education. Results: The study surveyed 182 students, with 55.5% female, ages 20 - 26 years old. Most dimensions have differences when measured directly and indirectly through standardized images, except for the distance of the kyphosis point - the point between bone and cartilage (k - r). There is a robust correlation between the two direct measurements (both > 0.9) and a moderate to robust correlation between the two measurement methods. The multivariate regression equation between the two methods is Direct measurement = 1.0048 x indirect measurement + 0.0317, with R2 = 0.96. Conclusion: Although the direct measurement method brings results close to reality, it has many shortcomings and is difficult to deploy on a large scale. The indirect measurement method through standardized photos has many advantages and can overcome the weaknesses of direct measurement if possible deviations that may occur during the measurement process are limited.

Article Details

References

Trần Tuấn Anh (2017) Nghiên cứu một số đặc điểm hình thái, chỉ số đầu – mặt ở một nhóm người Việt độ tuổi từ 18-25 có khớp cắn bình thường và khuôn mặt hài hòa, Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, tr. 1-30.
2. Đinh Sỹ Mạnh (2017) Nghiên cứu một số kích thước, chỉ số nhân trắc vùng đầu mặt và hình thái tháp mũi sinh viên Y tuổi từ 18-25 trên ảnh kỹ thuật số, Luận văn thạc sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, tr. 38-53.
3. Claman H, et al (1990) "Standardized portrait photography for dental patients". Am J Orthop dentofac orthop, 98, pp. 197-205.
4. Farkas L.G (1994) Anthropometry of the Head and Face, Raven press New York,
5. Farkas L.G, Bryan T, Marko K (2002) "Differences between direct (anthropometric) and indirect (cephalometric) measurements of the skull". The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 13 (1), pp. 105-188.
6. Farkas L.G, Bryan T, Marko K, et al (2003) "Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young White adult men and Women". The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 14 (2), pp. 154-162.
7. Jayaratne Y.S.N, Zwahlen R.A (2014) "Application of Digital Anthropometry for Craniofacial Assessment". Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstruction, 7, pp. 101-107.
8. Zhang X, Hans M.G, Graham G, et al (2007) "Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form". American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 131 (1), pp. 67-71.