EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR CANCER PATIENTS WITH FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA AND SEPSIS IN EMERGENCY AND INTENSIVE CARE DEPARTMENT – VIETNAM NATIONAL CANCER HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the treatment outcomes for cancer patients with febrile neutropenia and sepsis. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study on 44 patients diagnosed with febrile neutropenia and sepsis from October 2019 to October 2020. Results: 47.7% of patients required a second-line antibiotic regimen after initial empirical antibiotic therapy. 65.9% of patients recovered, while 34.1% worsened and did not respond to treatment. Most patients needed a change in their antibiotic regimen when positive cultures were obtained; patients with negative cultures only required a single antibiotic regimen. Patients with lower neutrophil counts (grade III, IV) or higher SOFA scores (SOFA ≥ 9 points) had significantly higher mortality rates, whereas procalcitonin levels assessing infection status were not related to mortality rates. Conclusion: Antibiotic treatment regimens were adjusted appropriately based on the course of the disease and microbiological results. The mortality rate was as high as 34.1%. Patients with severe neutropenia (grade III, IV) had higher mortality rates compared to others. Patients with severe organ dysfunction (SOFA ≥ 9 points) also had higher mortality rates than the remaining group.
Article Details
Keywords
neutropenia fever, cancer, sepsis
References
2. Nguyễn Đạt Anh, Nguyễn Hồng Hà, Nguyễn Vũ Trung (2016). Hướng dẫn điều trị kháng sinh theo kinh nghiệm. Nhà xuất bản Y học
3. Phạm Thị Minh Đức (2011). Sinh lý học. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Tr.99-137.
4. Aapro MS et al (2011). Update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte - colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy - induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer; 47(1):8-32
5. Gregory K Robbins (2019). Fever in the neutropenic adult patient with cancer.www. Uptodate.com
6. Klastersky J. et al on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee (2016). Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Oncology, Volume 27, Issue suppl_5, September 2016, Pages v111-v118
7. Mervyn Singer, Clifford S. Deutschman et al - The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) - JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810
8. Rhee C et al. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009- 2014. JAMA 2017 Oct 3; 318:1241
9. Viscoli C, Bruzzi P, Castagnola E, et al. Factors associated with bacteremia in febrile, granulocytopenic cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:430–7