SURGICAL TREATMENT OF EXTRACRANIAL CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL: 10 YEARS EXPERIENCE

Văn Nút Lâm, Văn Quảng Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Carotid endarterectomy has been proven for many years worldwide to be a safe and effective treatment method. Although there have been many studies evaluating the results of carotid endarterectomy, there are currently few studies evaluating the long-term results of surgery. Objective: To assess the short-term, mid-term and long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenosis treated with carotid endarterectomy. Patients and methods: A retrospective descriptive case series was conducted from March 2012 to December 2022 at the Vascular Surgery Department of Chợ Rẫy Hospital. Results: During the period from 2012 to 2022, we performed 294 cases of carotid endarterectomy. The average age was 67.3 (52-91). The male/female ratio was 5.6/1. 82.7% of patients had symptoms of carotid artery stenosis at admission, 85.7% of patients had severe stenosis of the carotid artery on the surgical side on computed tomography. 68% of patients were given general anesthesia; carotid shunting was performed in 23,9 % of patients. Carotid endarterectomy was performed using the inversion technique in 218 cases (74.1%), 46 cases (15.6%) underwent with conventional plus patch angioplasty, the remaining cases (10.3%) were incised longitudinally and sutured directly. Early results: there were 8 (2.7%) cases of cerebrovascular accident, of which 3 (1%) cases died, myocardial infarction had 2 cases (0.83%). After 1-5 years of follow-up, all patients had good clinical symptoms, and there were 7 (2.4%) cases of restenosis. Conclusion: Carotid endarterectomy is a safe and effective treatment method with low rates of adverse events and complications. The rates of restenosis and cerebrovascular accidents during medium and long-term follow-up are very low.

Article Details

References

1. Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions. Neurology. 2021;97(20 Supplement 2):S6-S16. doi:10.1212/ wnl.0000000000012781
2. Lewis SC. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008: 372: p.2132–42.
3. Naylor R, Rantner B, Ancetti S, et al. Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2023;65(1): 7-111. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011
4. AbuRahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA. Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Journal of vascular surgery. 2011;54(5):1502-1510.
5. Wiske C, Arhuidese I, Malas M, Patterson R. Comparing the efficacy of shunting approaches and cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy using a national database. J Vasc Surg. Aug 2018;68(2):416-425. doi:10.1016/ j.jvs.2017.11.077
6. Levin SR, Farber A, Goodney PP, et al. Shunt intention during carotid endarterectomy in the early symptomatic period and perioperative stroke risk. J Vasc Surg. Oct 2020;72(4):1385-1394.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.047
7. Paraskevas KI, Robertson V, Saratzis AN, Naylor AR. Editor's Choice - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Apr 2018;55(4):465-473. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.025
8. Schneider JR, Helenowski IB, Jackson CR, et al. A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group. J Vasc Surg. May 2015;61(5): 1216-22. doi:10.1016/ j.jvs.2015.01.049
9. Đỗ Kim Quế, Đào Hồng Quân. Phẫu thuật bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh: kinh nghiệm 1200 trường hợp tại một trung tâm. Tạp chí Phẫu thuật Tim mạch và Lồng ngực Việt Nam. 02/01 2021;30:83-89. doi:10.47972/vjcts.v30i.478