EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF EVERSION CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY TO TREAT CAROTID ARTERIES OCCLUSION AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL

Đức Tín Lê, Văn Nút Lâm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Surgery for carotid artery disease has been applied for a long time. Carotid artery surgery should be the first choice in patients with low surgical risk, with the group having symptoms with stenosis of 50 - 99% and the group without symptoms with stenosis from 70 - 99% of the research sample [7]. There are two surgical methods, including eversion endarterectomy and artificial vascular patch. According to the study of Cao P et al. (2000), with a sample size of 1353 cases, comparing the two surgical methods of inverted endarterectomy and artificial vascular patch surgery, there was no difference in long-term follow-up. However, the mortality rate in the follow-up period of inverted endarterectomy was lower than that of artificial vascular patch surgery, accounting for 8.1% and 9.3% of the research sample, respectively [6]. At Cho Ray Hospital, many studies have not evaluated the long-term results of carotid blood circulation after endovascular carotid artery dissection. That is the reason why we conducted this study. Methods: Retrospective description of case series. Results: The study had an average age of 75.4 ± 18.2, with the majority being male. Lipid metabolism disorders and diabetes accounted for 88.9% and 70.8%, respectively. Most of the cases in the study were symptomatic, accounting for 76.2%. Carotid Arterial lesions with 70-90% stenosis of the lumen diameter were the main ones, accounting for 79.8% of the study sample. Local anesthesia accounted for 57.2%. Most did not use shunts during surgery. Common carotid and internal carotid artery combined everion endarterectomy accounted for a high proportion, accounting for 89.5%. The carotid artery clamping time was about 18.5 minutes, and the average surgical time was about 54 minutes. The technical success rate was 97.9%, the 30-day mortality rate was 2.7%. The primary patency rate accounted for 85.1% of the study sample during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm has a high technical success rate, few complications, and a high survival rate in the follow-up period. Therefore, this method is effective, safe, and has few complications

Article Details

References

1. Que, D. K. ., Long, L. P. ., & Hung, P. P. . (2020). Phẫu thuật bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh kinh nghiệm 500 trường hợp. Tạp chí Phẫu thuật Tim mạch và Lồng ngực Việt Nam, 12, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.47972/vjcts.v12i.298
2. Quảng, N. V. ., Bảo, D. Đinh ., & Ánh, P. M. . (2020). Điều trị ngoại khoa hẹp động mạch cảnh ngoài sọ bằng kỹ thuật lột ngược nội mạc với gây tê tại chỗ. Tạp chí Phẫu thuật Tim mạch và Lồng ngực Việt Nam, 21, 53-57. https://doi.org/10. 47972/vjcts.v21i.63
3. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST).Lancet.1998;351:1379-1387.
4. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid End- arterectomy Trial collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1415–1425.
5. Cinà CS, Clase CM, Haynes BR. (1999). Refining the indications for carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: A systemic review. J Vasc Surg 30:606-18.
6. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G, Palombo D, Peinetti F, Spartera C, Stancanelli V, Vecchiati E. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000 Jan;31(1 Pt 1):19-30
7. AbuRahma AF, Avgerinos ED, Chang RW, Darling RC 3rd, Duncan AA, Forbes TL, Malas MB, Murad MH, Perler BA, Powell RJ, Rockman CB, Zhou W. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1S):4S-22S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.073. Epub 2021 Jun 19. PMID: 34153348.
8. Demirel S, Attigah N, Bruijnen H, Ringleb P, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G, Böckler D; SPACE Investigators. Multicenter experience on eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: observations from the Stent-Protected Angioplasty Versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE-1) trial. Stroke. 2012 Jul;43(7): 1865-71. doi: 10.1161 /STROKEAHA. 111.640102. Epub 2012 Apr 10. PMID: 22496334.
9. Bertoletti G, Varroni A, Misuraca M, Massucci M, Pacelli A, et al (2013) Carotid Artery Diameters, Carotid Endarterectomy Techniques and Restenosis. J Vasc Med Surg 1: 114