EVALUATION OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF STAGE FIGO IB1-IIA1 CERVICAL CANCER AT THAI NGUYÊN ONCOLOGY CANCER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of surgery for cervical cancer stage FIGO IB1-IIA1 at the Oncology Center of Thai Nguyen Central Hospital. Method: A retrospective descriptive study of 79 patients with stage FIGO IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy at the Oncology Center, Thai Nguyen Central Hospital from November 1, 2015 to December 30, 2023. Results: Mean age was 50 ± 10.4 years old. The rate of postoperative pelvic lymph node metastasis was 12.7%. Pelvic lymph node metastasis was statistically significantly associated with: Tumor size, DSI level, LVSI status (p<0.0001). The most common early postoperative complication was urinary retention (11.4%). The most common late postoperative complication was ureteral stenosis (3.8%). The most common late complication in the group of patients who received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was hemorrhagic proctitis (35.7%). Mean overall survival (OS) was 79.9 ± 3.0 months. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 93.5% và 89.0%, respectively. Mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.9 ± 4.9 months The 3-year and 5-year DFS rates were 85,0% và 70,8%, respectively. Conclusion: Radical surgery for cervical cancer is a safe and highly effective treatment in terms of oncology, with complications within acceptable limits and mainly acute complications, good recovery and low rate of chronic complications.
Article Details
Keywords
Cervical cancer, radical hysterectomy, treatment outcome, oncology center, Thai Nguyen
References
2. Boria, F., et al., Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2021. 31(9): p. 1212-1219.
3. Widschwendter, P., et al., Prognostic factors for and pattern of lymph-node involvement in patients with operable cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019. 300(6): p. 1709-1718.
4. Wojdat, R. and E. Malanowska, Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH. Biomed Res Int, 2022. 2022: p. 5163886.
5. Li, P., et al., Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study. Front Oncol, 2022. 12: p. 879569.
6. Alfonzo, E., et al., No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer, 2019. 116: p. 169-177.
7. Leitao, M.M., Jr., et al., The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes. Gynecol Oncol, 2022. 166(3): p. 417-424.
8. Di Donato, V., et al., Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis. Gynecol Oncol, 2023. 174: p. 49-54.