Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 29/10/2024
Abstract Views: 173
Views pdf: 63
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v543i3.11571
Issue
Vol. 543 No. 3 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. C., Nguyễn, T. L., Đỗ, X. V., & Hồ, S. H. (2024). COMPARISON OF MILD OVARIAN STIMULATION BY CLOMIPHENCITRATE 100 MG AND 150 MG COMBINED WITH FSH IN IVF PATIENTS WITH DIMINISHED OVARIAN RESERVE AT THE NATIONAL OBSTETRICS HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 543(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v543i3.11571

COMPARISON OF MILD OVARIAN STIMULATION BY CLOMIPHENCITRATE 100 MG AND 150 MG COMBINED WITH FSH IN IVF PATIENTS WITH DIMINISHED OVARIAN RESERVE AT THE NATIONAL OBSTETRICS HOSPITAL

Thị Cúc Nguyễn, Thành Luân Nguyễn, Xuân Vinh Đỗ, Sỹ Hùng Hồ

Main Article Content

Abstract

A retrospective study on diminished ovarian reserve patients, undergoing mild ovarian stimulation, from August 2020 to August 2022 at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology to investigate the oocytes and embryos in 2 groups (group 1: dose of Clomiphen Citrate 100mg/day combined with FSH 150UI - 225UI; group 2: dose of Clomiphen Citrate 150mg/day combined with FSH 150UI - 225UI). The results showed that total FSH dose of group I was 1538,51 ± 332,43UI; group II was 1603,02 ± 331,83UI. The number of obtained oocytes and MII oocytes of group I (5,68 ± 4,92 and 4,47 ± 3,95) were higher than those of group II (4,78 ± 2,69 và 3,18 ± 2,16). The total number of embryos obtained from group I was 3,41 ± 2,80, which was higher than that of group II, 2,90 ± 1,58. The difference in the number of obtained embryos between the 2 groups was not significant statistic (p>0.05). Thus, mild ovarian stimulation is a potential approach for patients with diminishes ovarian reserve. In which, using doses of Clomiphen Citrate 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day gave similar results.

Article Details

Keywords

Diminished ovarian reserve, mild stimulation, Clomiphene citrate

References

1. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria†. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul 1; 26(7):1616-24
2. Jirge PR. Poor ovarian reserve. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016; 9(2): 63-69. DOI: 10.4.103/0974-1208.183514.
3. Nguyễn Đình Đông và cs. Poseidon Iii, Iv: Mild Or Antagonist? Hosrem. 2019.
4. Vũ Văn Tâm, Đỗ Diễm Hường. Nghiên cứu hiệu quả của phác đồ kích thích nhẹ buồng trứng trên bệnh nhân làm thụ tinh trong ống tại bệnh viện Phụ Sản Hải Phòng, Tạp chí Phụ Sản. 2017;16(01): 169-172,
5. ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo as- sessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 22(6):632-646. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.001
6. Nguyễn Viết Tiến, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Phượng và Cs (2012). Đồng thuận phôi by HOSREM - Issuu. issuu.com/huynhhoa/docs/layout_dtp_7-12__2_
7. Trịnh Thị Ngọc Yến, Dương Tiến Tùng, Hồ Nguyệt Minh. (2022). Chất lượng noãn, phôi và kết quả có thai của phác đồ kích thích buồng trứng nhẹ so với phác đồ kích thích buồng trứng liều cao ở bệnh nhân giảm dự trữ buồng trứng. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 159(11), 132-139.
8. Vương Thị Ngọc Lan (2016). Giá Trị Các Xét Nghiệm AMH, FSH và AFC Dự Đoán Đáp Ứng Buồng Trứng Thụ Tinh Trong Ống Nghiệm, Đại Học Y Dược TP Hồ Chí Minh: TP Hồ Chí Minh
9. Kriseman M, Mills C, Kovanci E, et al. Antimullerian hormone levels are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. Sep 2015; 32(9): 1313-6. doi:10. 1007/s10815-015-0540-0
10. Polinder S, Heijnen EM, Macklon NS, Habbema JD, (2008). Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: A randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint. Hum Reprod; 23(2): 316-23. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem372