THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AFTER 3 MONTHS OF ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GINGIVAL RECESSION – A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY

Bảo Ngọc Trần, Thu Hằng Đỗ, Mẹo Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Clinical evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) with or without Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the treatment of gingival recessions type I (Cairo 2011). Materials and methods: Randomized controlled clinical study was conducted on 16 gingival recession lesions type 1 (Cairo 2011) with 8 gingival recession lesions treated with only CAF flaps (control group) and 8 gingival recession lesions treated with CAF flap + MucodermÒ (PADM) (test group). The effectiveness of study was assessed by clinical parameters including Gingival Recession Depth (RD), Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL), Height of Keratinized Tissue (HKT), Gingival Thickness (GT), Percentage of Root Coverage (%RC) at baseline, 1 month and 3 months. Results: A statistically significant reduction in CAL, RD, %RC values ​​was recorded in both groups after a month of surgery. However after 3 months, only statistically significant maintenance was recorded in test group. In test group, the percentage of RC and teeth with complete root coverage were 75% and 62.5%, respectively, higher than in control test, which were 37,5% and 25%. This difference is not statistically significant (p<0.05). Only in the test group, there was a significant increase in GT value (p<0.05) and this result was statistically higher than the control group. Conclusion: At 3 month, CAF+PADM provided similar root coverage to CAF alone, but a significant increase in gingival thickness, reduce the risk of recurrence and loss of keratinized tissue.

Article Details

References

1. Santana RB, Mattos CM, Dibart S. A clinical comparison of two flap designs for coronal advancement of the gingival margin: semilunar versus coronally advanced flap. Journal of clinical periodontology. Jul 2010;37(7):651-8. doi:10. 1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01582.x
2. Zucchelli G. CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP WlTH RELEASING INCISIONS. Mucogingival Esthetic Surgery. Qyintessenza Edizioni; 2012:257-328:chap 17.
3. Zucchelli G. Rootcoverage surgical techniques. Mucogingival Esthetic Surgery. Quintessenza Edizioni; 2012:113-127:chap 9.
4. Ahmedbeyli C, İpçi ŞD, Cakar G, Kuru BE, Yılmaz S. Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcpe. 12211. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2014/03/01 2014;41(3): 303-310. doi:https://doi. org/10.1111/jcpe.12211
5. Sangiorgio JPM, Neves F, Rocha Dos Santos M, et al. Xenogenous Collagen Matrix and/or Enamel Matrix Derivative for Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part I: Clinical Outcomes. J Periodontol. Dec 2017;88(12):1309-1318. doi:10. 1902/jop.2017.170126
6. Fathiazar A, Shariatmadar Ahmadi R, Sayar F. A Comparison between Mucoderm® and Connective Tissue Graft for Root Coverage. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran). Sep 2022;23(2 Suppl): 402-409. doi:10.30476/dentjods.2021. 90830.1535
7. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R, et al. Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology. Sep 2019;46(9):937-948. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13163