EVALUATION OF THE ADVERSE REACTION TO FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPGHY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Since its introduction in 1961 by Novotny and Alvis, intravenous fluorescein angiography has been widely used to identify retinal and choroidal pathology. Fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) is a valuable test used to investigate ocular circulation. Although intravenous fluorescein angiography is a relatively safe procedure, a wide variety of adverse reactions and complications are described in literature after fluorescein angiography, ranging from mild to severe and rarely even causing death. Purpose: To describe adverse reactions of fluorescein angiography. Methods: This was a single-center, descriptive study that was initiated with 250 patients who undergone FFA for evaluation of adverse events between August 2023 to June 2024. An informed consent was obtained. All patients were ≥ 7 years of age. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, nursing, a history of allergy to fluorescein, kidney failure, liver failure. Results: The mean age was 49,54 ± 15,35 (range 7-77 yo). Male/ female= 141/109. 7 patients have a history of alergy. No adverse events were seen in 89.2% (223 patients), mild adverse reactions were seen on 23 patients (9.2%), moderate reactions were seen on 4 patients (1.6%), No severe adverse reaction was seen. The most common side effects were nausea (6.8%, 17 patients). Conclusion: Our study indicates that FFA is a safe procedure. The most common side effects are nausea.
Article Details
Keywords
fluorescein angiography, adverse reaction, intravenous fluorescein, side effects.
References
2. Yannuzzi LA, Rohrer KT, Tindel LJ, et al. Fluorescein Angiography Complication Survey. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(5): 611-617. doi:10.1016/ S0161-6420(86)33697-2
3. Kwan AS, Barry C, McAllister IL, Constable I. Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(1):33-38. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01136.x
4. Kalogeromitros DC, Makris MP, Aggelides XS, et al. Allergy skin testing in predicting adverse reactions to fluorescein: a prospective clinical study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 2011; 89(5): 480-483. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768. 2009.01722.x
5. Stein MR, Parker CW. Reactions Following Intravenous Fluorescein. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971; 72(5): 861-868. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(71)91681-3
6. Brown RE, Sabates R, Drew SJ. Metoclopramide as prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting induced by fluorescein. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960. 1987;105(5):658-659. doi:10.1001/ archopht.1987.01060050076041
7. Kornblau IS, El-Annan JF. Adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography: A comprehensive review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(5): 679-693. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.02.004
8. Yannuzzi LA, Rohrer KT, Tindel LJ, et al. Fluorescein Angiography Complication Survey. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(5): 611-617. doi:10. 1016/S0161-6420(86)33697-2
9. Kwiterovich KA, Maguire MG, Murphy RP, et al. Frequency of Adverse Systemic Reactions after Fluorescein Angiography: Results of a Prospective Study. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(7):1139-1142. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32165-1
10. Yang Y, Zhang Z, Li T, Gu Z, Sun Y. Risk factors for vasovagal reaction associated with cerebral angiography via femoral catheterisation. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017;23(5):546-550. doi:10. 1177/1591019917717577