OUTCOMES OF OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION (ORIF) FOR CLOSED TRIMALLEOLAR FRACTURES AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Xuân Chương Đinh, Đình Toàn Dương

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation surgery for closed trimalleolar fractures at Viet Duc University Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study of 34 patients with trimalleolar fractures at Viet Duc University Hospital from 01/2022 to 06/2024. Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.5 ± 13,2 years. The female-to-male ratio was 2:1. Half of the patients were admitted due to traffic accidents. The most common injury mechanisms were supination-external rotation and supination-adduction. The majority of fractures were classified as type B according to the AO classification. The mean pre-operative posterior malleolar displacement was 5.21 ± 4,31 mm. In 67.7% of cases, there was a tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. The mean pre-operative tibiofibular clear space was 8.01 ± 3,06 mm. The superficial wound infection rate was 5,9% (2 patients). The mean post-operative posterior malleolar displacement was 0,650 ± 1,11 mm. 95.7% of patients had complete healing of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The mean post-operative tibiofibular clear space was 4,65 ± 0,75 mm. At the 3-month follow-up, the mean (AOFAS) score was 92,6 ± 5,78 Conclusions: Open reduction and internal fixation is an effective treatment for closed trimalleolar fractures, achieving good ankle function for patients.

Article Details

References

1. Verhage SM, Krijnen P, Schipper IB, Hoogendoorn JM. Persistent postoperative step-off of the posterior malleolus leads to higher incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in trimalleolar fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139(3): 323-329. doi:10.1007/s00402-018-3056-0
2. Thịnh VT, Mai DNL, Triều TMLT, Sơn NT, Thùy NX. Kết quả phẫu thuật gãy kín mắt cá chân tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức, năm 2019. TCNCYH. 2022;149(1): 67-77. doi:10.52852/ tcncyh.v149i1.388
3. Elsoe R, Ostgaard SE, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology of 9767 ankle fractures. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2018;24(1):34-39. doi:10. 1016/j.fas.2016.11.002
4. Li Y, Luo R, Li B, et al. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of posterior malleolus fracture in adults. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1): 507. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-04007-w
5. Comadoll S, Paull TZ, Boike SC, Vang S, Moua GY, Nguyen MP. Preoperative CT Scan is not Associated with Shorter Surgical Time or Improved Patient Outcomes for Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):173-177.
6. Nguyễn Bá Ngọc. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm X quang khớp cổ chân ở người Việt Nam trưởng thành và kết quả điều trị gãy kín Dupuytren bằng phương pháp kết xương bên trong. Published online 2021.
7. Burwell HN, Charnley AD. The treatment of displaced fractures at the ankle by rigid internal fixation and early joint movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47(4):634-660.
8. Ostrum RF, De Meo P, Subramanian R. A critical analysis of the anterior-posterior radiographic anatomy of the ankle syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(3):128-131. doi:10.1177/ 107110079501600304
9. Injuries about the ankle. Accessed July 23, 2024. https://hutaif-orthopedic.com/2513-en
10. Fraktur Dan Dislokasi Ankle | PDF. Scribd. Accessed July 23, 2024. https://id.scribd.com/ doc/174479467/fraktur-dan-dislokasi-ankle