RESULT OF MULTILEVEL ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION (ACDF) IN MULTILEVEL HERNIATED CERVICAL DISCS PATIENTS WITH MEDULLARY HYPERINTENSE AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in treating cervical disc herniation with cervical cord medullary hyperintense at Bach Mai Hospital. Method: 26 patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation with cervical cord medullary hyperintense underwent multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery at the Orthopedic and Spine Department at Bach Mai Hospital from October 2019 to May 2022. Results: The mJOA score improved statistically significantly from 10.1 ± 2.68 to 15.9 ± 2.02 (p < 0.01), with a mJOA recovery rate of 74.11%. The mJOA recovery rate was higher in the group with single-level with cervical cord medullary hyperintense compared to the group with 2-level with cervical cord medullary hyperintense, and this difference was statistically significant. There is a negative correlation between the mJOA recovery rate and the length of cervical cord medullary hyperintense on MRI images, with an r-value of -0.45 and a p-value of 0.018. Conclusion: The presence of cervical cord medullary hyperintense on MRI significantly predicts recovery after multi-level ACDF surgery.
Article Details
Keywords
the length of cervical cord medullary hyperintense, ACDF
References
2. Kim YK, Kang D, Lee I, Kim SY. Differences in the Incidence of Symptomatic Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation According to Age, Sex and National Health Insurance Eligibility: A Pilot Study on the Disease's Association with Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Sep 25 2018;15(10) doi:10.3390/ijerph15102094
3. Kelsey JL, Githens PB, Walter SD, et al. An epidemiological study of acute prolapsed cervical intervertebral disc. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. Jul 1984;66(6):907-14. doi:10.2106/00004623-198466060-00011
4. Lan NTN. Nghiên cứu thực trạng thoát vị đĩa đệm cột sống tại cộng đồng. Y học Việt Nam. 2011:50-57.
5. McCormack B.M, Weinstein P.R. Cervical spondylosis. An update. The Western journal of medicine. Jul-Aug 1996;165(1-2):43-51.
6. Bakhsheshian J, Mehta V.A, Liu J.C. Current Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Global spine journal. Sep 2017;7(6): 572-586. doi:10.1177/ 2192568217699208
7. Nouri A, Martin AR, Mikulis D, Fehlings MG. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques. Neurosurgical focus. Jun 2016;40(6):E5. doi:10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1667
8. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. Jan 2017;26(1):78-84. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4660-8
9. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 18 2013;95(18):1651-8. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00589
10. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. Jul 1988;13(7): 870-6. doi:10.1097/ 00007632-198807000-00032