IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS AND VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN DIAGNOSIS OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS IN PATIENTS WITH PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC LITHOTRYPSY AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Hải Sơn Nguyễn, Thanh Dũng Lê, Thái Bình Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to describe the imaging characteristics and value of magnetic resonance in diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in patients with percutaneous transhepatic lithotrypsy at Hanoi Medical University hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive and prospective study was conducted on 60 choledocholithiasis patients evaluated by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) before undergoing percutaneous transhepatic lithotrypsy at Hanoi Medical University hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. The presence of choledocholithiasis was confirmed by laser fragmentation and mechanical basket extraction through a transhepatic tunnel. Imaging characteristics including the number of stones, type, margin characteristics, structure, signal, and location of the choledocholithiasis stones will be described on MRCP images. The value of MRCP in the diagnosis of gallstones will be assessed and compared through US and CT images. Results: Common imaging characteristics of choledocholithiasis on MRCP include: 68.3% with more than 3 stones, 71.7% pigmented stones, 68.3% stones with heterogeneous structure, 76.7% stones with increased signal on T1-weighted images, 61.7% stones with decreased signal on T2-weighted images, 98.3% biliary dilatation within the liver, 71.7% dilatation of the main biliary duct outside the liver, and dilatation of the common bile duct. The detection rates of stones on ultrasound, CT, and MRCP are 78.3%, 95.3%, and 100%, respectively. The stone detection locations on MRCP corresponded with verified actual locations during laser fragmentation and basket extraction procedures. Conclusion: MRCP is a non-invasive diagnostic method with higher choledocholithiasis detection capability than ultrasound and CT. It has the best detection and evaluation ability for the number, location and structure of choledocholithiasis within and outside the liver.

Article Details

References

1. Murphy MC, Gibney B, Gillespie C, Hynes J, Bolster F. Gallstones top to toe: what the radiologist needs to know. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:13. doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0825-4
2. Nguyễn Việt Thành. So sánh giá trị của các phương pháp chẩn đoán không xâm hại trong bệnh sỏi đường mật chính. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học. Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; 2009.
3. Nguyễn Đình Hối. Sỏi đường mật. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2012.
4. Tsai HM, Lin XZ, Chen CY, Lin PW, Lin JC. MRI of gallstones with different compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(6):1513-1519. doi:10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821513
5. Phạm Hồng Liên, Phạm Minh Thông. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm hình ảnh và giá trị của cộng hưởng từ trong chẩn đoán sỏi ống mật chủ. 2012;(6):86-92. doi:10.55046/vjrnm.6.236.2012
6. Saito H, Iwagoi Y, Noda K, et al. Dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for biliary stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 33(1): 32-39. doi:10.1097/ MEG. 0000000000001832
7. You MW, Jung YY, Shin JY. Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Evaluation of Choledocholithiasis in Patients with Suspected Cholecystitis. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2018;78(3):147. doi:10.3348/jksr.2018.78.3.147