RESEARCH ON ORAL CANCER SURGEY WITH RECONSTRUCTIVE DEFECTS BY NASOLABIAL FLAP

Anh Bích Trần, Thúc Luân Ngô

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Reconstructing defects after the surgical removal of invasive oral cavity cancer is always a challenge in head and neck surgery. These defects need to be reconstructed anatomically and functionally to optimize oral cavity functions such as speech, chewing, swallowing, and aesthetics. The nasolabial flap is a skin-muscle flap based on the vascular pedicle of the face, offering advantages in terms of color, robustness, flexibility, and discreet scarring at the donor site. Objectives: To evaluate the technique of using nasolabial flaps for reconstructing defects at Cho Ray Hospital from January 2020 to October 2023. Patients and methods: A prospective interventional clinical study without a control group. The study involves 32 cases using nasolabial flaps to reconstruct oral cavity defects in groups I and II. Results: The size of the nasolabial flaps: width 2.7±0.25cm, length 5.8±0.3cm, thickness 1±0.1cm, pedicle: facial artery and vein(32/32), pedicle length: 13.5±0.4cm. Oral cavity defects (according to LIU): Group I (13/32), Group II (19/32), no discontinuity of mandible. Postoperatively, all flaps survived, and the donor sites healed well. After 3 months, the recipient sites healed, oral cavity functions were normal, and the donor sites healed well. Complications: 7/32 cases had grade III-IV mandibular branch nerve paralysis, recovering after 6 – 8 months; 5 cases had grade III facial paralysis and 2 cases had grade IV facial paralysis. Conclusions: The nasolabial flap, with its long vascular pedicle, is fairly stable and has a high survival rate, making it a good option for reconstructing medium-sized defects in the oral cavity.

Article Details

References

Nguyễn Hồng Lợi (2023), “Ứng dụng các vạt da cơ có cuống trong tạo hình khuyết hổng sau phẫu thuật triệt để ung thư biểu mô khoang miệng tại Bệnh viện Trung Ương Huế”, Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ, (58), 202-209.
2. Cái Hữu Ngọc Thảo Trang, Nguyễn Hoàng Vũ, Nguyễn Anh Tuấn (2022), “Các dạng phân nhánh động mạch mặt trên người Việt Nam”, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam 518 tháng 9 số chuyên đề.
3. Amin Rahpeyma, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi (2016), “The place of nasolabial flap in orofacial reconstruction: A review”, Ann Med Surg (Lond), 12, pp. 79–87. DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.11.008
4. Joo, Y. H., (2019). Guidelines for the surgical management of oral cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 12(2),107-144. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2018.01816
5. Lazaridou, M. (2016). Nasolabial pedicled compared with island flaps for intraoral reconstruction of oncological defects: complications, recovery of sensitivity, and assessment of quality of life. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 54(7), 746-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.04.017
6. Liu, W. W. (2017), “A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery”, Oncology Letters, 14(6), 7049-7054. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7139
7. Stretton, C. (2023). Postoperative considerations in patients following oral cancer resection and surgical reconstruction: a review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Anesthesia, 2. DOI: 10.21037/joma-22-34