THE VALUE OF DIAPHRAGMATIC RAPID SHALLOW BREATHING INDEX FOR PREDICTING WEANING OUTCOME FROM MECHANICAL VENTILATION

Ngọc Sơn Đỗ , Hồng Thái Phan, Quốc Tuấn Đặng, Thế Anh Trịnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the Diaphragmatic Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (D-RSBI) for weaning outcomes in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Subjects: Patients indicated for weaning from mechanical ventilation at the Center for Critical Care Medicine of Bach Mai Hospital from July 2023 to August 2024. Method: Prospective descriptive study. Eligible patients who met the criteria for weaning from mechanical ventilation were subjected to weaning. Respiratory rate and diaphragmatic ultrasound index were collected 30-60 minutes after the initiation of weaning, and the D-RSBI index was calculated. Diaphragmatic ultrasound was performed using a convex and linear probe ultrasound machine by a physician with ultrasound certification, video made and verified by radiologist. Results: 33 patients were recruited in the study. The male-to-female ratio was twice as high in males compared to females. Clinical and paraclinical indices showed no statistically significant differences. The success rate of weaning was 42.4% (n=14), with inadequate cough being the primary reason for failure, accounting for 63.2% (n=12). Compared to RSBI, NIF, Vt, and P0.1, the D-RSBI index had a higher prognostic value for weaning failure. The AUC, Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV for the DE-RSBI on the right were 0.966; 89.5; 100; 89.47; 87.50, respectively; DTF-RSBI on the right were 0.814; 94.7; 64.3; 94.73; 90.00, respectively; DE-RSBI on the left were 0.900; 73.7; 92.9; 73.68; 72.22 respectively; DTF-RSBI on the left were 0.726; 52.6; 92.9; 52.63; 59.09, respectively. There was only a linear correlation between the D-RSBI indies and other weaning prediction indices. Conclusion: The D-RSBI index has high value in predicting weaning failure.

Article Details

References

1. Augustus Oglesby HJ, Cataldo SH, Pedro MJ (2021). Automated Near Real-Time Ventilator Data Feedback Reduces Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Events: A Retrospective Observational Study. Crit Care Explor, 3(4), e0379. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000379.
2. Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, et al (2011). Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med, 39(12), 2612. doi:10.1097/ CCM. 0b013e3182282a5a.
3. Spadaro S, Grasso S, Mauri T, et al (2016. Can diaphragmatic ultrasonography performed during the T-tube trial predict weaning failure? The role of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index. Crit Care, 20, 305. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1479-y.
4. Abbas A, Embarak S, Walaa M, et al (2018). Role of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index in predicting weaning outcome in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 13, 1655-1661. doi:10.2147/COPD.S161691.
5. Song J, Qian Z, Zhang H, et al (2022). Diaphragmatic ultrasonography-based rapid shallow breathing index for predicting weaning outcome during a pressure support ventilation spontaneous breathing trial. BMC Pulm Med, 22, 337. doi:10.1186/s12890-022-02133-5.
6. Dean R.H and Robert M.K (2014). Essentials of Mechanical Ventilation. McGraw-Hill Education, third edition, New York, 16, 164-175.
7. Nguyễn Minh Hải, Bùi Văn Cường, Đặng Quốc Tuấn (2023). Đánh giá vai trò của siêu âm cơ hoành trong tiên lượng cai thở máy. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam, 521, 194-197.
8. Đỗ Ngọc Sơn, Vũ Thị Thu Giang, Vũ Đăng Lưu (2019). Đánh giá các chỉ số siêu âm cơ hoành ở BN đợt cấp bệnh phổi mạn tính tắc nghẽn. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 482, 109-115.
9. Vũ Thị Thu Giang, Đỗ Ngọc Sơn, Vũ Đăng Lưu (2019). Giá trị của siêu âm cơ hoành trong dự báo kết quả cai thở máy thành công ở BN đợt cấp bệnh phổi tắc nghẽn mạn tính. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 482, 116-123.
10. Danaga A. R., Gut A. L., Antunes L. C. de O., et al (2009). Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and cut-off value for the rapid shallow breathing index in predicting extubation failure. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 35(6), 541–547. doi:10.1590/s1806-3132009000600007.