THE VALUE OF DIAPHRAGMATIC RAPID SHALLOW BREATHING INDEX FOR PREDICTING WEANING OUTCOME FROM MECHANICAL VENTILATION

Ngọc Sơn Đỗ, Hồng Thái Phan, Quốc Tuấn Đặng, Thế Anh Trịnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the Diaphragmatic Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (D-RSBI) for weaning outcomes in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Subjects: Patients indicated for weaning from mechanical ventilation at the Center for Critical Care Medicine of Bach Mai Hospital from July 2023 to August 2024. Method: Prospective descriptive study. Eligible patients who met the criteria for weaning from mechanical ventilation were subjected to weaning. Respiratory rate and diaphragmatic ultrasound index were collected 30-60 minutes after the initiation of weaning, and the D-RSBI index was calculated. Diaphragmatic ultrasound was performed using a convex and linear probe ultrasound machine by a physician with ultrasound certification, video made and verified by radiologist. Results: 33 patients were recruited in the study. The male-to-female ratio was twice as high in males compared to females. Clinical and paraclinical indices showed no statistically significant differences. The success rate of weaning was 42.4% (n=14), with inadequate cough being the primary reason for failure, accounting for 63.2% (n=12). Compared to RSBI, NIF, Vt, and P0.1, the D-RSBI index had a higher prognostic value for weaning failure. The AUC, Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV for the DE-RSBI on the right were 0.966; 89.5; 100; 89.47; 87.50, respectively; DTF-RSBI on the right were 0.814; 94.7; 64.3; 94.73; 90.00, respectively; DE-RSBI on the left were 0.900; 73.7; 92.9; 73.68; 72.22 respectively; DTF-RSBI on the left were 0.726; 52.6; 92.9; 52.63; 59.09, respectively. There was only a linear correlation between the D-RSBI indies and other weaning prediction indices. Conclusion: The D-RSBI index has high value in predicting weaning failure.

Article Details

References

1. Augustus Oglesby HJ, Cataldo SH, Pedro MJ (2021). Automated Near Real-Time Ventilator Data Feedback Reduces Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Events: A Retrospective Observational Study. Crit Care Explor, 3(4), e0379. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000379.
2. Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, et al (2011). Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med, 39(12), 2612. doi:10.1097/ CCM. 0b013e3182282a5a.
3. Spadaro S, Grasso S, Mauri T, et al (2016. Can diaphragmatic ultrasonography performed during the T-tube trial predict weaning failure? The role of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index. Crit Care, 20, 305. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1479-y.
4. Abbas A, Embarak S, Walaa M, et al (2018). Role of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index in predicting weaning outcome in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 13, 1655-1661. doi:10.2147/COPD.S161691.
5. Song J, Qian Z, Zhang H, et al (2022). Diaphragmatic ultrasonography-based rapid shallow breathing index for predicting weaning outcome during a pressure support ventilation spontaneous breathing trial. BMC Pulm Med, 22, 337. doi:10.1186/s12890-022-02133-5.
6. Dean R.H and Robert M.K (2014). Essentials of Mechanical Ventilation. McGraw-Hill Education, third edition, New York, 16, 164-175.
7. Nguyễn Minh Hải, Bùi Văn Cường, Đặng Quốc Tuấn (2023). Đánh giá vai trò của siêu âm cơ hoành trong tiên lượng cai thở máy. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam, 521, 194-197.
8. Đỗ Ngọc Sơn, Vũ Thị Thu Giang, Vũ Đăng Lưu (2019). Đánh giá các chỉ số siêu âm cơ hoành ở BN đợt cấp bệnh phổi mạn tính tắc nghẽn. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 482, 109-115.
9. Vũ Thị Thu Giang, Đỗ Ngọc Sơn, Vũ Đăng Lưu (2019). Giá trị của siêu âm cơ hoành trong dự báo kết quả cai thở máy thành công ở BN đợt cấp bệnh phổi tắc nghẽn mạn tính. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 482, 116-123.
10. Danaga A. R., Gut A. L., Antunes L. C. de O., et al (2009). Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and cut-off value for the rapid shallow breathing index in predicting extubation failure. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 35(6), 541–547. doi:10.1590/s1806-3132009000600007.