PREVALENCE OF PLAQUE-INDUCED GINGIVITIS AND EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LASER-ASSISTED GINGIVITIS TREATMENT

Thị Thái Hà Trịnh , Thị Thu Hiền Bùi, Hà Thanh Lưu, Thu Anh Tạ, Trọng Đức Nguyễn, Tùng Kiên Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Describe the current prevalence of plaque-related gingivitis and assess the effectiveness of laser-assisted gingivitis treatment in patients at the Department of Odontology - 108 Military Central Hospital from March 2024 to July 2024. Research method: Describe a cluster of cases on 35 patients, scaling with diode laser, collecting data based on clinical examination forms before treatment, 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment. Results: The average gingival index (GI) in men was higher than in women (2.10 ± 0.33 vs. 1.89 ± 0.51). Patients aged 30 years and older had a higher mean GI than those under 30 years (2.06 ± 0.15 and 1.93 ± 0.42, respectively). After 2 weeks, mild gingivitis accounted for 59.9%, moderate 34.3% and severe gingivitis 8.6%, while before treatment, the majority of patients had severe gingivitis (71.4%) and no patients had GI <1.0. Comparing the treatment results after 1 week and after 2 weeks, the number of patients with mild gingivitis increased from 0% to 62.9% after 1 week and tended to decrease after 2 weeks (57.1%). The majority of patients had a 1-2 degree reduction in gingivitis after 2 weeks. Only less than 1/10 of patients had no reduction in GI or even an increase in GI. Conclusion: Laser-assisted gingivitis treatment is significantly effective in improving the gingival index at different times after treatment compared to before treatment, most patients have a gingivitis level reduced by 1-2 degrees after 2 weeks of treatment

Article Details

References

Elias-Boneta AR, Ramirez K, Rivas-Tumanyan S, et al. Prevalence of gingivitis and calculus in 12-year-old Puerto Ricans: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):13.
2. Mostafa B, El-Refai I. Prevalence of Plaque-Induced Gingivitis in a Sample of the Adult Egyptian Population. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(3):554-558.
3. Angst PDM, Piccinin FB, Oppermann RV, et al. Response of molars and non-molars to a strict supragingival control in periodontal patients %J Brazilian Oral Research. 2013;27:55-60.
4. Roy S, Singh DK, Manohar B. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and tissue response in patients undergoing conventional flap surgeries with or without 940 nm diode laser exposure - A randomized clinical study. Journal of education and health promotion. 2022;11:417.
5. Saha A, Kamble P, Mangalekar SB. Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Therapy With and Without Use of Diode Laser (DL) in the Treatment of Chronic Generalized Periodontitis: A Clinico-Microbiological Study. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e35720.
6. Polizzi E, Tetè G, Targa C, et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of the Diode Laser in the Reduction of the Volume of the Edematous Gingival Tissue after Causal Therapy. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(17).
7. Wawrzyk-Bochenek I, Łobacz M, Wilczyński S, et al. Evaluation of the Tooth Surface after Irradiation with Diode Laser Applied for Removal of Dental Microorganisms from Teeth of Patients with Gingivitis, Using X-ray Photoelectron (XPS) and Optical Profilometry (OP). Journal of clinical medicine. 2022;11(22).