EFFECTIVENESS OF CANALICULAR LACERATION REPAIR USING MONOCANALICULAR INTUBATION WITH MONOKA TUBES

Thanh Nam Nguyễn, Thị Cẩm Vân Biện, Tường Trí Hải Tôn, Trọng Kim Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of canalicular laceration repair using monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes. Methods: A total of 46 patients with 47 lacerated canaliculi were repaired using monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes and were continuously followed for 3 months on. All tubes were removed at 3rd month. Epiphora symptoms were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Fluorescein dye disappearance test, syringing and probing were perfomed at 3 months (tube extrusion). Demographic information, injury locations, associated ocular injuries, complications and outcomes were analysed. Results: Mean patient age was 47 years (range 25–79 years). There were 41 lower canalicular lacerations (89%), 4 upper canalicular lacerations (9%) and 1 both canicular lacerations included. Overall, 37 of 46 cases (80,4%) showed complete improvement in symptoms and exhibited positivity on the dye disappearance test at 3rd month after the procedure, 1 patient (2%) suffered functional failure. In addition, 42 patients (91,3%) gained anatomical success with patency on syringing and probing showed hard stop result. Complications were seen in five cases and included one punctal slit, one lower eyelid slit and two punctal granuloma. Remarkably, there were no case encountered early tube protrusion. Conclusions: Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes leads to successful outcomes without significant complications and offers an alternative to bicanalicular intubation and Mini – monoka tubes in the treatment of monocanalicular lacerations.

Article Details

References

Vương Văn Quý (2005), "Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu thuật phục hồi lệ quản đứt do chấn thương bằng ống si-li-côn", Luận án Tiến sỹ Y học.
2. Anastas C. N., Potts M. J., Raiter J. (2001), "Mini Monoka siliconee monocanalicular lacrimal stents: Subjective and objective outcomes". Orbit, 20 (3), pp. 189-200.
3. J.H Chung, K.S Na, G.J Choi (2000), "The Effectiveness of Canaliculoplasty Using Mini-Monoka(r) or Bicanalicular Stent for Repair of Upper and Lower Canalicular Laceration".J Korean Ophthalmol Soc, 41 (10), pp. 2138-2143
4. Naik M. N., Kelapure A., Rath S., Honavar S. G. (2008), "Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent". Am J Ophthalmol, 145 (2), pp. 375-380.
5. Lee H., Ahn J., Shin H. H., Park M., Baek S. (2012), "Effectiveness of primary monocanalicularnasal intubation with Monoka tubes and nasal endoscopic findings for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with enlarged lacrimal sac and chronic dacryocystitis".J Craniofac Surg, 23 (6), pp. 1638-41.
6. Vũ Anh Lê (2002)), "Đánh giá kết quả bước đầu phục hồi mi mắt lệ quản chấn thương với ống si-li-côn".Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh – chuyên đề nhãn khoa, 6 (4), pp. 30-36.
7. Trần Văn Lê Liêm (2010), "Nghiên cứu phục hồi rách bờ mi do chấn thương cơ học".
8. Ho T., Lee V. (2006), "National survey on the management of lacrimal canalicular injury in the United Kingdom".Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 34 (1), pp. 39-43.
9. Smit T. J., Mourits M. P. (1999), "Monocanalicular lesions: to reconstruct or not".Ophthalmology, 106 (7), pp. 1310-2.
10. Nguyễn Văn Thịnh (2011), "So sánh phương pháp đặt nòng silicone một lệ quản mini-monoka và hai lệ quản hình vòng trong phục hồi lệ quản chấn thương", Đại học Y Dược Tp. Hồ Chí Minh.