ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PEMPHIGUS VULGARIS BASED ON THE PEMPHIGUS DISEASE AREA INDEX (PDAI)

Thị Hà Giang Qúach, Thị Huyền Trần, Hữu Ghi Đào, Thị Thanh Thùy Nguyễn, Thị Lan Phạm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the characteristics of the assessment of severity according to the PDAI score of patients with pemphigus vulgaris and some related factors. Subjects and methods: Describe the progression of 82 patients with mild to severe pemphigus vulgaris according to the PDAI score. To compare the differences in PDAI scores by age, gender, the status of systemic immunosuppressive medicine, and to assess the correlation of PDAI scores with the time of onset. The study was conducted at the National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, from March 2023 to February 2024. Results: According to the PDAI score, there were 12,2% of patients with mild disease, 30.49% of patients with moderate disease and 57,32% of patients with severe disease. There was no difference in total PDAI scores, cutaneous PDAI, and mucosal PDAI between age groups 20- 40, 41-60 years and ≥ 60 years (p=0,7447, p=0,8014, p=0,5405, respectively) and gender (p=0,4914, p=0,6900, p=0,1873, respectively). There was no difference in total PDAI, cutaneous PDAI, and mucosal PDAI scores between treated and untreated patients (p=0,114, p=0,5496, p=0,0685, respectively)). There was an inverse correlation between the total PDAI score and the time of onset (r=-0,24, p=0,0267). Conclusion: The PDAI is a reliable and valuable scale in assessing the severity of pemphigus. PDAI is divided by region including skin PDAI, mucosal PDAI for more specific values than only the total PDAI score.

Article Details

References

Kasperkiewicz M, Ellebrecht CT, Takahashi H, et al. Pemphigus. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2017;3(1):17026. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.26
2. Lim YL, Bohelay G, Hanakawa S, Musette P, Janela B. Yen Loo Lim, Gerome Bohelay, Sho Hanakawa, Autoimmune Pemphigus: Latest Advances and Emerging Therapies, Front. Mol.Biosci. 8:808536. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;8:26.
3. Pollmann R, Schmidt T, Eming R, Hertl M. Pemphigus: a Comprehensive Review on Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation and Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018; 54(1):1-25. doi:10.1007/s12016-017-8662-z
4. Shimizu T, Takebayashi T, Sato Y, et al. Grading criteria for disease severity by pemphigus disease area index. J Dermatol. 2014;41(11):969-973. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.12649
5. Boucher* D, Wilson A, Murrell* DF. Pemphigus scoring systems and their validation studies – A review of the literature. Dermatol Sin. 2023;41(2):67-77. doi:10.4103/ds.DS-D-22-00150
6. Joly P, Horvath B, Patsatsi Α, et al. Updated S2K guidelines on the management of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus initiated by the european academy of dermatology and venereology (EADV). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2020;34(9):1900-1913. doi:10.1111/jdv.16752
7. Rosenbach M, Murrell DF, Bystryn JC et al. Reliability and convergent validity of two outcome instruments for pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 2404–2410.
8. Mohebi F, Tavakolpour S, Teimourpour A, Toosi R, Mahmoudi H, Balighi K, Ghandi N, Ghiasi M, Nourmohammadpour P, Lajevardi V, Abedini R, Azizpour A, Nasimi M, Daneshpazhooh M. Estimated cut-off values for pemphigus severity classification according to pemphigus disease area index (PDAI), autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (ABSIS), and anti-desmoglein 1 autoantibodies. BMC Dermatol. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12895-020-00105-y.
9. Murrell DF, Dick S, Ahmed AR, et al. Consensus statement on definitions of disease, end points, and therapeutic response for pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(6): 1043-1046.
10. Patsatsi A, Kyriakou A, Giannakou A, Pavlitou-Tsiontsi A, Lambropoulos A, Sotiriadis D. Clinical Significance of Anti-desmoglein-1 and -3 Circulating Autoantibodies in Pemphigus Patients Measured by Area Index and Intensity Score. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94(2): 203-206. doi:10.2340/00015555-1666